before the 2011 Entry Draft.bills09 wroteCOLONseriously... when did that rule come in to effect...
glad there was some league input!
[2012] Entry Draft Discussion
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
my bad ... I'll re-pick
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
What the hell caused everyone to start naming their damn children Tanner in the early '90s?
Makes me envision young people fashioning leather garments.
Makes me envision young people fashioning leather garments.
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
A self fulfilling The Village People fantasy, Mike?
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
I don't understand everyone giving their children last names for first names ... MacKenzie, Tanner, Conner, Cooper, etc. I'm waiting for Smith.
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
Seriously, who names their kids Hampus Frk ?
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
wait wait wait ... Johnson? Please tell me you're fucking kidding.
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
Yep... even seen a patient of mine whose first named that.
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
not sure what's worse, last names for first or parents who combine names to make one. Example: Jackery ...
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
Connor and cooper sound like first names to me. Connor more than cooper mind you.
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
KapG wroteCOLONConnor and cooper sound like first names to me. Connor more than cooper mind you.
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
Rumor:
How highly did the Blue Jackets value defenseman Ryan Murray before taking him with the No. 2 overall pick in Friday's first round of the NHL Draft? Enough to turn down an eye-opening offer from the New York Islanders, who, according to numerous NHL sources, offered all of their picks -- one in each round -- for the right to move up from No. 4 to No. 2 for Murray.
That's right, for the Jackets' No. 2 pick, the Islanders offered pick Nos. 4, 34, 65, 103, 125, 155 and 185. The bounty would have given the Jackets the following picks: 4, 31, 34, 62, 65, 95, 103, 125, 152, 155, 182 and 185. And if that weren't enough, the Jackets could have had the Kings' No. 30 if they wanted it.
Next week's development camp would have required two sheets of ice.
Blue Jackets GM Scott Howson offered a "no comment" when reached by The Dispatch late Sunday. After Friday's first round, he did mention a "very attractive" trade offer the Blue Jackets declined before selection Murray, a precocious prospect whom many think could play in the NHL this season.
The Islanders, unable to move up for Murray, drafted highly-touted defenseman Griffin Reinhart with the No. 4 pick. But they didn't stop there. The Islanders spent all seven of their picks on defensemen.
From that Portline guy from earlier. He is a fairly reputable source.
How highly did the Blue Jackets value defenseman Ryan Murray before taking him with the No. 2 overall pick in Friday's first round of the NHL Draft? Enough to turn down an eye-opening offer from the New York Islanders, who, according to numerous NHL sources, offered all of their picks -- one in each round -- for the right to move up from No. 4 to No. 2 for Murray.
That's right, for the Jackets' No. 2 pick, the Islanders offered pick Nos. 4, 34, 65, 103, 125, 155 and 185. The bounty would have given the Jackets the following picks: 4, 31, 34, 62, 65, 95, 103, 125, 152, 155, 182 and 185. And if that weren't enough, the Jackets could have had the Kings' No. 30 if they wanted it.
Next week's development camp would have required two sheets of ice.
Blue Jackets GM Scott Howson offered a "no comment" when reached by The Dispatch late Sunday. After Friday's first round, he did mention a "very attractive" trade offer the Blue Jackets declined before selection Murray, a precocious prospect whom many think could play in the NHL this season.
The Islanders, unable to move up for Murray, drafted highly-touted defenseman Griffin Reinhart with the No. 4 pick. But they didn't stop there. The Islanders spent all seven of their picks on defensemen.
From that Portline guy from earlier. He is a fairly reputable source.
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
i don't believe that to be true at all.
And if it was, both GMs should be fired on the block lol
And if it was, both GMs should be fired on the block lol
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
Regardless, CBJ were smart to take Murray. A lot more of a safe pick, but he still has exceptional qualities.
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
As a side note, please feel free to drop your draft picks in CBS once made to prevent 5 billion times the work for us later I'd suggest not dropping any of the current round.
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
once all my picks are made, will doKezia wroteCOLONAs a side note, please feel free to drop your draft picks in CBS once made to prevent 5 billion times the work for us later I'd suggest not dropping any of the current round.
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
DONE!Kezia wroteCOLONAs a side note, please feel free to drop your draft picks in CBS once made to prevent 5 billion times the work for us later I'd suggest not dropping any of the current round.
Inaugural GM
[STL] 2009 - 2016
[PHI] 2019 -
[STL] 2009 - 2016
[PHI] 2019 -
Re: [2012] Entry Draft Discussion
Thanks for the PM Chuck, pick coming.