I 100% agree, i use to talk to shook a lot about Nonis, and he said this woudl happen.SuperMario wroteCOLONI was listening to Dave Nonis on the radio yesterday and he was asked the question: "what would you differently if you had to go back in this year and do it?"
His answer: "Looking back I would have made more moves at the deadline. But it's tough to say now because we were 9 points into a playoff spot. So at the time, I thought we were okay."
It boggles my mind that he didn't think this defence needed help. Meanwhile, Montreal acquires Weaver for a 5th? Philly gets Macdonald for a 2nd + 3rd? I'm not a believer in trading futures for pending UFAs. But I"m pretty certain we could have gotten SOME help from somewhere without mortgaging our future. We didn't need to get Vanek - the guy they spent most of the day on. They should have spent the day getting a d-man.
During the year, the following d-men were moved:
Diaz (5th)
Klein (Del Zotto)
Meszaros (3rd)
Schultz (5th)
Macdonald (2nd, 3rd)
Robidas (4th)
Weaver (5th)
I just don't believe there wasn't one d-man we could have gotten for a 4th or 5th.
Said Nonis gets 'stuck on' certainly players and trades and will miss out on other deals. That was clear at this deadline. This years UFA crop has some decent, yet older dman available.
i'm sticking to my guns when i say we need to trade gunnar for an improvement up front, give granberg his spot, and sign a good dman via - free agency.
we also need to bring back Komorov...that guy actually played like he gave a shit.