Playoffs - Week 3

Mike · Post by **Mike** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 8:03 am

TOR v PIT
LAK v NSH

Post by **Shoalzie** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 8:33 am

I'll be boring and pick Toronto vs. Los Angeles in the finals.

Post by **thom54** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 8:45 am

With the games played advantage ... it's LA and TOR... otherwise I thought NSH had a reasonable shot.

Post by **Fraser** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 8:48 am

Hoy hell your not kidding there is some GP disparity in both match ups. Yeah TOR vs. LA looking real likely.

Lee · Post by **Lee** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 8:50 am

Another boring TOR - LA finish.

Post by **The BBKL Insider** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 8:58 am

Fraser wroteCOLONHoy hell your not kidding there is some GP disparity in both match ups. Yeah TOR vs. LA looking real likely.

my GP advantage is goalies. He's only started Darling again. so dont let that fool ya

Post by **dave1959** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:21 am

If Nashville can get his goalie situation sorted out...he can win this thing.

Post by **The BBKL Insider** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:22 am

Miks team is actually pretty scary. He made some big/bold moves that have paid off.

Post by **thom54** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:46 am

yea ... Mik's team / his offense is rather intimidating ... that's going to be a big battle

Post by **Arian The Insider** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:53 am

TOR v PIT
LAK v NSH
bold prediction

Post by **kyuss** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 12:32 pm

dave1959 wroteCOLONIf Nashville can get his goalie situation sorted out...he can win this thing.

well I wish I knew how to..

Tony · Post by **Tony** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 12:37 pm

Shocker... This is almost as boring and predictable as the NBA finals.

Post by **The BBKL Insider** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 12:48 pm

funny, you guys need to stop being so cheap and it could have easily been you here. Mik decided to pay up this year and he's been on fire since. The history of this league has never been won by a GM playing the 'cheap game' and needing to win every deal. If you want to win get better players and pay fair prices, if not shut up and watch from a distance.

Lee · Post by **Lee** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 1:08 pm

Can confirm, Tony didn't want to pay a very reasonable price for offense... the player offered is on fire currently and has been since the deadline.

Post by **Bruyns** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 1:21 pm

Yep if Tony had Stafford he would have won BBKL this year.

Lee · Post by **Lee** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 1:22 pm

I agree

Post by **lightupdadarkness** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 1:49 pm

Mike wroteCOLONTOR v PIT
LAK v NSH

Post by **The BBKL Insider** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 1:58 pm

picking a tie eh? nice call!

Post by **kyuss** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 5:35 pm

Well Darling starts tonight, which means dressing him and Bob might very well bring me over 4 starts.

I really don't think the Jackets can keep rolling, so I'd be fine again with only Darling in my lineup, BUT I wouldn't be able to dress Kuznetsov and Jaskin that way (because of needed room on the bench), which is something I want to do this week.

fuck

Post by **Matthew** » Mon Mar 30, 2015 5:41 pm

Why risk going over on goalie starts and ruining your entire week?

Buds Board Keepers League

Playoffs - Week 3

Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3

Re: Playoffs - Week 3