Waiver Exemption
Waiver Exemption
Why do we not use the Nhls model of 160 NHL gp or 5 years after first pro contract
Imo our current system is far to soft and we should look to model the nhls system
Imo our current system is far to soft and we should look to model the nhls system
Re: Waiver Exemption
There has been talk of something like 100 gp or 25 years old.
Re: Waiver Exemption
In my opinion we should be mimicking the NHL wherever possible. So I would be in support of getting ourselves closer to that standard.
Re: Waiver Exemption
NHL doesn't use the system billy said - it has a 3 variable sliding scale.
Re: Waiver Exemption
Regardless imo we should be mimicking the NHL as close as possible imoNick wroteCOLONNHL doesn't use the system billy said - it has a 3 variable sliding scale.
Re: Waiver Exemption
What id like to see
18-20: All slide unless on Roster
20-25: Waiver exempt unless played 160+ NHL gp
25+ Requires Waivers
18-20: All slide unless on Roster
20-25: Waiver exempt unless played 160+ NHL gp
25+ Requires Waivers
Re: Waiver Exemption
I hate the bonus cushion
Re: Waiver Exemption
Bonuses are going to be a pain in the ass without capgeek.thom54 wroteCOLONI hate the bonus cushion
- Shoalzie
- PostsCOLON 12673
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:28 pm
- LocationCOLON Portland, MI
- CONTACTCOLON
Re: Waiver Exemption
The rules are based on when a guy first signs...something we'd need to dig up from the archives of CapGeek.
Here are the basics:
http://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-waiver-wire-primer/
Another interesting rule I found while poking around is in regards to sending a guy down after they've been recalled. They only have to clear waivers again if they stay up with the NHL club for 10 games or 30 days. I've wondered about why certain guys can go back down to waivers after being called up...they've just not been up with the team long enough.
Here are the basics:
http://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-waiver-wire-primer/
Another interesting rule I found while poking around is in regards to sending a guy down after they've been recalled. They only have to clear waivers again if they stay up with the NHL club for 10 games or 30 days. I've wondered about why certain guys can go back down to waivers after being called up...they've just not been up with the team long enough.
Re: Waiver Exemption
bills09 wroteCOLONRegardless imo we should be mimicking the NHL as close as possible imoNick wroteCOLONNHL doesn't use the system billy said - it has a 3 variable sliding scale.
We do/did as far as is reasonable. including when a player signed in a 3 variable system becomes complicated.
I think we could lower the GP threshold, in part because we draw a line in the sand at roster submission.
Waiver Exempt starting goalies is a larger issue for us, IMO.
Re: Waiver Exemption
Yeah, isn't waiver exemption for goalies in the NHL between 60-80 games depending on age signed. I'm pretty sure it is less than skaters.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: Waiver Exemption
same as for usMatthew wroteCOLONYeah, isn't waiver exemption for goalies in the NHL between 60-80 games depending on age signed. I'm pretty sure it is less than skaters.
Re: Waiver Exemption
I did not know this. Thank you.Mike wroteCOLONsame as for usMatthew wroteCOLONYeah, isn't waiver exemption for goalies in the NHL between 60-80 games depending on age signed. I'm pretty sure it is less than skaters.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: Waiver Exemption
The issue for us is when they become " starters" & our gp lock is based on the roster submission
Perhaps do we make our count live?
Perhaps do we make our count live?
- Arian The Insider
- PostsCOLON 7304
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:05 pm
Re: Waiver Exemption
kimmer wroteCOLONI quit this league
Re: Waiver Exemption
Are there really that many guys 25+ with less than 125GP in this league?bills09 wroteCOLONOur gp number isn't the issue as much as the age (28)
Re: Waiver Exemption
Years after signing contract
Age
GP
x
practicality
I think there's ample evidence we went a little too liberal on the waiver exempt status. Let's tighten it a little in order to ensure that players who should be active, are in fact active. This goes back to the whole 30 teams issue.
Age
GP
x
practicality
I think there's ample evidence we went a little too liberal on the waiver exempt status. Let's tighten it a little in order to ensure that players who should be active, are in fact active. This goes back to the whole 30 teams issue.