BurnNick wroteCOLONJust like Paul Ranger was worth a lot more than anyone offered. Proved us all wrong.
C
Re: C
he was awful upon his return to the show.
watching one shift and it was painfully obvious.
He had nice hits, bs & shtoi. that weren't reliable because 1) he could be scratched any night, and 2) he could be back in the AHL the moment a coach opened his eyes.
I agree hindsight is 20/20. However a player's value is based on a whole bunch of perceptions, telling everyone else they are wrong and continuing to have them on the block for trade at a value only you have, doesn't make sense. If you think he's better than everyone else does, than he's clearly not on trade block (my own example, of course, is Gardiner). Blue & White goggles on full tint.
watching one shift and it was painfully obvious.
He had nice hits, bs & shtoi. that weren't reliable because 1) he could be scratched any night, and 2) he could be back in the AHL the moment a coach opened his eyes.
I agree hindsight is 20/20. However a player's value is based on a whole bunch of perceptions, telling everyone else they are wrong and continuing to have them on the block for trade at a value only you have, doesn't make sense. If you think he's better than everyone else does, than he's clearly not on trade block (my own example, of course, is Gardiner). Blue & White goggles on full tint.
Re: C
So what. It just means u failed as gm to read his projections/whether or not this was a temporary spike in value thus didn't jump on the best offer u gotten (ie 1st round pick from shiv) and just lost out on selling that asset at peak value. U thought he was gonna become fuckin #1dman lol
Edit: nick nailed it lol
Edit: nick nailed it lol
Re: C
kimmer wroteCOLONSo what. It just means u failed as gm to read his projections/whether or not this was a temporary spike in value thus didn't jump on the best offer u gotten (ie 1st round pick from shiv) and just lost out on selling that asset at peak value. U thought he was gonna become fuckin #1dman lol
Edit: nick nailed it lol
I'd love to see your current valuation of Gagner.
Re: C
No man ur evaluations suck penis. I don't agree with anything u say ever bro
- The BBKL Insider
- PostsCOLON 22628
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
- LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: C
You 2 are hilarious when u bicker
Re: C
just like u admit that youre wrong about being a weirdo about paul ranger lolLee wroteCOLONAdmitting you are wrong is more admirable than denying that you are wrong when proven so.
everyone was laughing at you you were like the laughing stock of bbkl holding out that long for a fuckin paul fuckin ranger lol but w/e ahahh
- lightupdadarkness
- PostsCOLON 4881
- JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: C
I've already admitted I was wrong by dropping him last week.
In hindsight, he didn't play another game after that season and had gone on to shit up the NLA.
That doesn't change the fact that he had great stats in the NHL during his tenure and was worth more, in my opinion, than what was being offered.
I said outright that I'd rather lose him for nothing than trade him for less that I think he is worth.
If the same happens with Gagner, than so be it, but I won't be strong armed into trading someone for less than I think the are worth.
In hindsight, he didn't play another game after that season and had gone on to shit up the NLA.
That doesn't change the fact that he had great stats in the NHL during his tenure and was worth more, in my opinion, than what was being offered.
I said outright that I'd rather lose him for nothing than trade him for less that I think he is worth.
If the same happens with Gagner, than so be it, but I won't be strong armed into trading someone for less than I think the are worth.
Re: C
So you are saying they should fuck and get it over with?The BBKL Insider wroteCOLONYou 2 are hilarious when u bicker
- lightupdadarkness
- PostsCOLON 4881
- JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: C
Paul doesn't satisfy your needs is what you are saying.......we can read between the lines!Lee wroteCOLONI'd only be hungry again 30 minutes later.