I didn't even talk about my offer, I merely pointed out the difference between what was considered a great offer in this thread (Hertl+9th) and what I was just asked for... (roughly 4 times more than that) ...apparently making Hertl + 9th look like another "easy no" for youlightupdadarkness wroteCOLON Most of your offers are shit you start off usually lowballing. You tout your prospects alI world so I think you need to take your own advice I gave you a list of players then I kindly say no that's not close for me and then you immediately come into my thread bashing that I turned down your offer ..
Aleksander Barkov
Re: Aleksander Barkov
Re: Aleksander Barkov
Is that what was asked? Jesus.kyuss wroteCOLONyeah, if I knew an offer for Barkov needed to be anything like Datsyuk + Larkin + Barbashev + Zane McIntyre + 11th overall + 14th overall I would have saved my time lolCasperX22 wroteCOLONI wouldn't call any part of your offer a headliner. I'd hardly call it an offer at all for Barkov.kyuss wroteCOLONguess what, what you call the headliner of the deal is a player YOU have repeatedly asked for.lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONMan yeah god Zane McIntyre as the headliner for both those trades how did I ever turn those down? Oh the irony......No Ragrets
Also, since you consider him the headliner, it means you value him better than the #11 pick overall...
Larkin + 11th would have been a reach for me.
- lightupdadarkness
- PostsCOLON 4881
- JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: Aleksander Barkov
Lolkyuss wroteCOLONI didn't even talk about my offer, I merely pointed out the difference between what was considered a great offer in this thread (Hertl+9th) and what I was just asked for... (roughly 4 times more than that) ...apparently making Hertl + 9th look like another "easy no" for youlightupdadarkness wroteCOLON Most of your offers are shit you start off usually lowballing. You tout your prospects alI world so I think you need to take your own advice I gave you a list of players then I kindly say no that's not close for me and then you immediately come into my thread bashing that I turned down your offer ..
- lightupdadarkness
- PostsCOLON 4881
- JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: Aleksander Barkov
LmaoFraser wroteCOLONIs that what was asked? Jesus.kyuss wroteCOLONyeah, if I knew an offer for Barkov needed to be anything like Datsyuk + Larkin + Barbashev + Zane McIntyre + 11th overall + 14th overall I would have saved my time lolCasperX22 wroteCOLONI wouldn't call any part of your offer a headliner. I'd hardly call it an offer at all for Barkov.kyuss wroteCOLONguess what, what you call the headliner of the deal is a player YOU have repeatedly asked for.lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONMan yeah god Zane McIntyre as the headliner for both those trades how did I ever turn those down? Oh the irony......No Ragrets
Also, since you consider him the headliner, it means you value him better than the #11 pick overall...
Larkin + 11th would have been a reach for me.
Re: Aleksander Barkov
yeah, I'll not move Larkin, no matter how BBKL GMs like to tell me how much I overrate my prospects lolFraser wroteCOLON Larkin + 11th would have been a reach for me.
Re: Aleksander Barkov
Larkin is an absolutely elite prospect. Could count on one hand the number of forward prospects I would take over him in the BBKL. Long term I like Larkin more than Barkov for BBKL production, but theres obviously a price to pay when one guy is in the NHL and another isn't.Lmao
Re: Aleksander Barkov
IMO NJD take a RW. The best they have is Connor Chatham.
Actually, he is the only one they hav.
Actually, he is the only one they hav.
Re: Aleksander Barkov
Rantanen would be no surpise there.Lee wroteCOLONIMO NJD take a RW. The best they have is Connor Chatham.
Actually, he is the only one they hav.
Re: Aleksander Barkov
Yup arguments could be made for BPA and an absolute positional need.
Re: Aleksander Barkov
Lee wroteCOLONYup arguments could be made for BPA and an absolute positional need.
I think positional need only comes into play when prospects are viewed as entirely equal, otherwise .. man just take the best damn player. Not like you can't trade later on
Re: Aleksander Barkov
Yeah that's what I'm saying. Rantanen is in the mix for BPA and he is of a positional need for the Devils. He's a no brainer.
- The BBKL Insider
- PostsCOLON 22628
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
- LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: Aleksander Barkov
i'm pretty sure the leafs will take marner
Re: Aleksander Barkov
Ratanen at this stage is not very different from Barkov on draft day. Mayhaps a little more of a goal scorer instead of a passer, but a lot of that is transition to the NHL.
Re: Aleksander Barkov
That's not what was offered and that said...lol! Barkov is worth more than 2 good prospects.Fraser wroteCOLONIs that what was asked? Jesus.kyuss wroteCOLONyeah, if I knew an offer for Barkov needed to be anything like Datsyuk + Larkin + Barbashev + Zane McIntyre + 11th overall + 14th overall I would have saved my time lolCasperX22 wroteCOLONI wouldn't call any part of your offer a headliner. I'd hardly call it an offer at all for Barkov.kyuss wroteCOLONguess what, what you call the headliner of the deal is a player YOU have repeatedly asked for.lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONMan yeah god Zane McIntyre as the headliner for both those trades how did I ever turn those down? Oh the irony......No Ragrets
Also, since you consider him the headliner, it means you value him better than the #11 pick overall...
Larkin + 11th would have been a reach for me.
Re: Aleksander Barkov
Filppula + Foligno + Guenin for Barkov + Nieto + Krug
- lightupdadarkness
- PostsCOLON 4881
- JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: Aleksander Barkov
I'd hate for you to have to change ur sig so no thanks. Funny how everyone bashes my trades but then ask for said players in trades ehkimmer wroteCOLONFilppula + Foligno + Guenin for Barkov + Nieto + Krug
- lightupdadarkness
- PostsCOLON 4881
- JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: Aleksander Barkov
Oh my stop it Kimmy.....turning me on over here!kimmer wroteCOLONI'm not funny, but I wish I was. I'm just easy, buy me a burrito and I'm down for whatever
Re: Aleksander Barkov
Was it something close to that offer? Cuz that is nuts. Is Barkov worth more than 2 good prospects? 35 points and little to no periphs. Larkin and a top 12 pick could easily each out produce Barkov. Maybe he is worth a bit more, but not even in the realm of the asking price above. I'd imagine that package could get almost any player in this league. I'd have thrown Patrick Kane + when kane was leading the league in points at mik if he had made that offer to me.yeah, if I knew an offer for Barkov needed to be anything like Datsyuk + Larkin + Barbashev + Zane McIntyre + 11th overall + 14th overall I would have saved my time lolThat's not what was offered and that said...lol! Barkov is worth more than 2 good prospects.Is that what was asked? Jesus.
Larkin + 11th would have been a reach for me.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: Aleksander Barkov
No, it was not. Drkness sent him a list of players that he would have interest in and Mik is using hyperbole to prove some kind of point. Mik's actual offer is actually kind of laughable.Matthew wroteCOLONWas it something close to that offer? Cuz that is nuts. Is Barkov worth more than 2 good prospects? 35 points and little to no periphs. Larkin and a top 12 pick could easily each out produce Barkov. Maybe he is worth a bit more, but not even in the realm of the asking price above. I'd imagine that package could get almost any player in this league. I'd have thrown Patrick Kane + when kane was leading the league in points at mik if he had made that offer to me.yeah, if I knew an offer for Barkov needed to be anything like Datsyuk + Larkin + Barbashev + Zane McIntyre + 11th overall + 14th overall I would have saved my time lolThat's not what was offered and that said...lol! Barkov is worth more than 2 good prospects.Is that what was asked? Jesus.
Larkin + 11th would have been a reach for me.