Aleksander Barkov

Negotiate your trades here.
BUTTON_POST_REPLY
User avatar
kyuss
PostsCOLON 14876
JoinedCOLON Thu May 06, 2010 12:54 pm

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by kyuss »

lightupdadarkness wroteCOLON Most of your offers are shit you start off usually lowballing. You tout your prospects alI world so I think you need to take your own advice I gave you a list of players then I kindly say no that's not close for me and then you immediately come into my thread bashing that I turned down your offer ..
I didn't even talk about my offer, I merely pointed out the difference between what was considered a great offer in this thread (Hertl+9th) and what I was just asked for... (roughly 4 times more than that) ...apparently making Hertl + 9th look like another "easy no" for you
User avatar
Fraser
PostsCOLON 3681
JoinedCOLON Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:38 am
LocationCOLON Perth, Western Australia

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by Fraser »

kyuss wroteCOLON
CasperX22 wroteCOLON
kyuss wroteCOLON
lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONMan yeah god Zane McIntyre as the headliner for both those trades how did I ever turn those down? Oh the irony......No Ragrets
guess what, what you call the headliner of the deal is a player YOU have repeatedly asked for.

Also, since you consider him the headliner, it means you value him better than the #11 pick overall...
I wouldn't call any part of your offer a headliner. I'd hardly call it an offer at all for Barkov.
yeah, if I knew an offer for Barkov needed to be anything like Datsyuk + Larkin + Barbashev + Zane McIntyre + 11th overall + 14th overall I would have saved my time lol
Is that what was asked? Jesus.

Larkin + 11th would have been a reach for me.
Image
User avatar
lightupdadarkness
PostsCOLON 4881
JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by lightupdadarkness »

kyuss wroteCOLON
lightupdadarkness wroteCOLON Most of your offers are shit you start off usually lowballing. You tout your prospects alI world so I think you need to take your own advice I gave you a list of players then I kindly say no that's not close for me and then you immediately come into my thread bashing that I turned down your offer ..
I didn't even talk about my offer, I merely pointed out the difference between what was considered a great offer in this thread (Hertl+9th) and what I was just asked for... (roughly 4 times more than that) ...apparently making Hertl + 9th look like another "easy no" for you
Lol
User avatar
lightupdadarkness
PostsCOLON 4881
JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by lightupdadarkness »

Fraser wroteCOLON
kyuss wroteCOLON
CasperX22 wroteCOLON
kyuss wroteCOLON
lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONMan yeah god Zane McIntyre as the headliner for both those trades how did I ever turn those down? Oh the irony......No Ragrets
guess what, what you call the headliner of the deal is a player YOU have repeatedly asked for.

Also, since you consider him the headliner, it means you value him better than the #11 pick overall...
I wouldn't call any part of your offer a headliner. I'd hardly call it an offer at all for Barkov.
yeah, if I knew an offer for Barkov needed to be anything like Datsyuk + Larkin + Barbashev + Zane McIntyre + 11th overall + 14th overall I would have saved my time lol
Is that what was asked? Jesus.

Larkin + 11th would have been a reach for me.
Lmao
User avatar
kyuss
PostsCOLON 14876
JoinedCOLON Thu May 06, 2010 12:54 pm

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by kyuss »

Fraser wroteCOLON Larkin + 11th would have been a reach for me.
yeah, I'll not move Larkin, no matter how BBKL GMs like to tell me how much I overrate my prospects lol
User avatar
Fraser
PostsCOLON 3681
JoinedCOLON Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:38 am
LocationCOLON Perth, Western Australia

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by Fraser »

Lmao
Larkin is an absolutely elite prospect. Could count on one hand the number of forward prospects I would take over him in the BBKL. Long term I like Larkin more than Barkov for BBKL production, but theres obviously a price to pay when one guy is in the NHL and another isn't.
Image
Lee
PostsCOLON 16828
JoinedCOLON Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:29 pm

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by Lee »

IMO NJD take a RW. The best they have is Connor Chatham.

Actually, he is the only one they hav.
User avatar
Fraser
PostsCOLON 3681
JoinedCOLON Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:38 am
LocationCOLON Perth, Western Australia

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by Fraser »

Lee wroteCOLONIMO NJD take a RW. The best they have is Connor Chatham.

Actually, he is the only one they hav.
Rantanen would be no surpise there.
Image
Lee
PostsCOLON 16828
JoinedCOLON Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:29 pm

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by Lee »

Yup arguments could be made for BPA and an absolute positional need.
User avatar
thom54
PostsCOLON 7459
JoinedCOLON Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:00 pm
LocationCOLON Kingston, ON

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by thom54 »

Lee wroteCOLONYup arguments could be made for BPA and an absolute positional need.

I think positional need only comes into play when prospects are viewed as entirely equal, otherwise .. man just take the best damn player. Not like you can't trade later on
Lee
PostsCOLON 16828
JoinedCOLON Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:29 pm

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by Lee »

Yeah that's what I'm saying. Rantanen is in the mix for BPA and he is of a positional need for the Devils. He's a no brainer.
User avatar
The BBKL Insider
PostsCOLON 22628
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by The BBKL Insider »

i'm pretty sure the leafs will take marner
Image
User avatar
Nick
PostsCOLON 16044
JoinedCOLON Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:15 am

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by Nick »

Ratanen at this stage is not very different from Barkov on draft day. Mayhaps a little more of a goal scorer instead of a passer, but a lot of that is transition to the NHL.
User avatar
CasperX22
PostsCOLON 6136
JoinedCOLON Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:37 pm

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by CasperX22 »

Fraser wroteCOLON
kyuss wroteCOLON
CasperX22 wroteCOLON
kyuss wroteCOLON
lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONMan yeah god Zane McIntyre as the headliner for both those trades how did I ever turn those down? Oh the irony......No Ragrets
guess what, what you call the headliner of the deal is a player YOU have repeatedly asked for.

Also, since you consider him the headliner, it means you value him better than the #11 pick overall...
I wouldn't call any part of your offer a headliner. I'd hardly call it an offer at all for Barkov.
yeah, if I knew an offer for Barkov needed to be anything like Datsyuk + Larkin + Barbashev + Zane McIntyre + 11th overall + 14th overall I would have saved my time lol
Is that what was asked? Jesus.

Larkin + 11th would have been a reach for me.
That's not what was offered and that said...lol! Barkov is worth more than 2 good prospects.
User avatar
kimmer
PostsCOLON 18090
JoinedCOLON Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:25 pm
LocationCOLON Ontario, Canada

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by kimmer »

Filppula + Foligno + Guenin for Barkov + Nieto + Krug
User avatar
lightupdadarkness
PostsCOLON 4881
JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by lightupdadarkness »

kimmer wroteCOLONFilppula + Foligno + Guenin for Barkov + Nieto + Krug
I'd hate for you to have to change ur sig so no thanks. Funny how everyone bashes my trades but then ask for said players in trades eh
User avatar
kimmer
PostsCOLON 18090
JoinedCOLON Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:25 pm
LocationCOLON Ontario, Canada

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by kimmer »

It's not funny. It's just easy
User avatar
lightupdadarkness
PostsCOLON 4881
JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by lightupdadarkness »

kimmer wroteCOLONI'm not funny, but I wish I was. I'm just easy, buy me a burrito and I'm down for whatever
Oh my stop it Kimmy.....turning me on over here!
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by Matthew »

yeah, if I knew an offer for Barkov needed to be anything like Datsyuk + Larkin + Barbashev + Zane McIntyre + 11th overall + 14th overall I would have saved my time lol
Is that what was asked? Jesus.

Larkin + 11th would have been a reach for me.
That's not what was offered and that said...lol! Barkov is worth more than 2 good prospects.
Was it something close to that offer? Cuz that is nuts. Is Barkov worth more than 2 good prospects? 35 points and little to no periphs. Larkin and a top 12 pick could easily each out produce Barkov. Maybe he is worth a bit more, but not even in the realm of the asking price above. I'd imagine that package could get almost any player in this league. I'd have thrown Patrick Kane + when kane was leading the league in points at mik if he had made that offer to me.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
CasperX22
PostsCOLON 6136
JoinedCOLON Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:37 pm

Re: Aleksander Barkov

Post by CasperX22 »

Matthew wroteCOLON
yeah, if I knew an offer for Barkov needed to be anything like Datsyuk + Larkin + Barbashev + Zane McIntyre + 11th overall + 14th overall I would have saved my time lol
Is that what was asked? Jesus.

Larkin + 11th would have been a reach for me.
That's not what was offered and that said...lol! Barkov is worth more than 2 good prospects.
Was it something close to that offer? Cuz that is nuts. Is Barkov worth more than 2 good prospects? 35 points and little to no periphs. Larkin and a top 12 pick could easily each out produce Barkov. Maybe he is worth a bit more, but not even in the realm of the asking price above. I'd imagine that package could get almost any player in this league. I'd have thrown Patrick Kane + when kane was leading the league in points at mik if he had made that offer to me.
No, it was not. Drkness sent him a list of players that he would have interest in and Mik is using hyperbole to prove some kind of point. Mik's actual offer is actually kind of laughable.
BUTTON_POST_REPLY

Return to