2016 Draft Discussion
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
Yeah, I had Barron highlighted too
the hockey news has him 74th
the hockey news has him 74th
- lightupdadarkness
- PostsCOLON 4881
- JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
Yeah had him rated pretty high and still only 17 some of the other guys coming off made it an easy choice
-
- PostsCOLON 4954
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:17 pm
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
He would have been taken at 187Lee wroteCOLONLove the Barron pick. Definitely was a target for 188
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
Yeah, I think with some of my picks last year, I focused too much on specific guys. Doing lots of research on available players and not just going to go with BPPA ( best player perceived available) I have about 15 guys now I'd be comfortable taking with my next pick.
- Arian The Insider
- PostsCOLON 7304
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:05 pm
-
- PostsCOLON 4954
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:17 pm
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
Lee wroteCOLONYeah, I think with some of my picks last year, I focused too much on specific guys. Doing lots of research on available players and not just going to go with BPPA ( best player perceived available) I have about 15 guys now I'd be comfortable taking with my next pick.
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
Yeah we were way ahead of the pace at one point, around 140ish. At that point, we were only 78 picks in the year before. ATM, we are 2 days ahead of last years pace.
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
Chuck Norris wroteCOLONLee wroteCOLONYeah, I think with some of my picks last year, I focused too much on specific guys. Doing lots of research on available players and not just going to go with BPPA ( best player perceived available) I have about 15 guys now I'd be comfortable taking with my next pick.
There's a lot to be said about BPA... I just don't think either the current NA nor EU BPA, according is ISS, is very good.
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
And each resource definitely had favourite types of players... It's such a fun time of year putting strategy into effect that we really won't see the NHL impact of in.... 5 years maybe? Potentially buying low on big gains
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
Yeah, I think we will get a bunch of these guys taken in our later rounds taken way earlier and we will see some reaches in our draft as well.
None of mine, of course.
None of mine, of course.
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
Arian The Insider wroteCOLONcan you guys pick already?
none of "us guys" are on the clock....it's Casper
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
Aka fucking Polunin...
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
Shutup, thom. Polunin isn't going to get drafted.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
That's what I'm afraid of hahaha... Awww
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
Who cares if he is drafted. You aren't banking on what teams think of him now. You're banking on what they think of him as a 22 year old.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
Lmao, Cliff. Why not just pick a guy from any prospect list just to give you a boom or bust prospect? Pass...wtf!
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: 2016 Draft Discussion
Yeah, I offered him Peluso for the pick. If that's approved, offer is still valid