VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
To Los Angeles:
Chris Tanev
Ryan Pulock
2018 1st Rounder (VAN)
2017 3rd Rounder (LAK)
To Vancouver:
Victor Hedman
Chris Tanev
Ryan Pulock
2018 1st Rounder (VAN)
2017 3rd Rounder (LAK)
To Vancouver:
Victor Hedman
- The BBKL Insider
- PostsCOLON 22628
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
- LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
Wasn't going to protect hedman. I suspect you'll start seeing value deals like this.
Confirm.
Confirm.
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
1st overall pickn in 2018 right there.
- Arian The Insider
- PostsCOLON 7304
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:05 pm
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
Fair value considering Steve wasn't going to protect Hedman. Interested to see how many deals like this happen due to expansion
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
Question: does playing 2 years in a non - north American pro league (KHL, SHL, Liiga) mean a player needs to be protected? So for example buchnevich.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
- The BBKL Insider
- PostsCOLON 22628
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
- LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
My understanding is he is exempt.Matthew wroteCOLONQuestion: does playing 2 years in a non - north American pro league (KHL, SHL, Liiga) mean a player needs to be protected? So for example buchnevich.
AHL/NHL only.
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
Have we set our rules on this for sure yet? Personally I think 2 AHL 1 NHL season players being available doesn't seem right to me.
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
We can only lose 1 player each. It's not the end of the world.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
looks good for fraser ! #notafarmteam
-
- PostsCOLON 4810
- JoinedCOLON Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:41 am
- LocationCOLON Wolfville, NS
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
Totally missed tanev in this deal the first time I looked at it. really prefer Steve's side.
-
- PostsCOLON 4043
- JoinedCOLON Sun Nov 06, 2011 5:09 pm
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
I think Steve does well, gets a young cost-controlled D who might not be as good as Hedman but is solid, and he adds a great prospect and two good picks as well. Hedman is UFA after this season as well which makes his cap hit unpredictable going forward.
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
he still has 1 yr at 4M though, if it was a UFA today would be very differentSensfanjosh wroteCOLONI think Steve does well, gets a young cost-controlled D who might not be as good as Hedman but is solid, and he adds a great prospect and two good picks as well. Hedman is UFA after this season as well which makes his cap hit unpredictable going forward.
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
There are a couple teams who will definitely need to move dmen for expansion. Either trading for futures or upgrading their 2 dmen for 1 better dman.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
- lightupdadarkness
- PostsCOLON 4881
- JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
Like for Steve Victor getting at least 9m a year IMO
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
Easy deal for Steve to make given the circumstances. Hedman could touch 10 m aav after this year.
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
Depends on the situation too, for me if I expect to lose Andersen I can leave really valuable players unprotected. I can only lose one player so if I lose Andersen then who cares how amazing my other unprotected guys are since they won't be taken or one does and I keep my goalies. Some teams might not have a lot of motivation to worry about trading good players for futures knowing they can only lose one guy.Matthew wroteCOLONThere are a couple teams who will definitely need to move dmen for expansion. Either trading for futures or upgrading their 2 dmen for 1 better dman.
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
Yea, i think if you have a clear top8 forwards for example, well it makes sense to consolidate that. But if you have a deeper team and the unprotected guys are all roughly similar value ... you either completely overhaul, or just continue on with business as usual and know you'll lose on of your multiple assets.
Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster
Interesting perspective.Bruyns wroteCOLONDepends on the situation too, for me if I expect to lose Andersen I can leave really valuable players unprotected. I can only lose one player so if I lose Andersen then who cares how amazing my other unprotected guys are since they won't be taken or one does and I keep my goalies. Some teams might not have a lot of motivation to worry about trading good players for futures knowing they can only lose one guy.Matthew wroteCOLONThere are a couple teams who will definitely need to move dmen for expansion. Either trading for futures or upgrading their 2 dmen for 1 better dman.