Trump vs Clinton

[kimmer]

T-10 hrs u poor american fucks get to find a new president
Trump currently leading
Seek asylum here

[Shoalzie]

I'm voting tonight after work. I can say with confidence the person I'm voting for won't win but that's okay.

[Lee]

I'd vote for trump because he will do the least amount of damage.
nothing he wants to happen will. Hillary is a snake so deeply in the pockets of corporations that she can do some serious damage.

[hong57]

I'm voting tonight after work. I can say with confidence the person I'm voting for won't win but that's okay.

why do you support him?

[kimmer]

I'm voting tonight after work. I can say with confidence the person I'm voting for won't win but that's okay.

why do you support him?

I think he means hes voting a 3rd party candidate outside of trump Hilary

[Lee]

can someone please tag bernie back in as an independant? he's really the only good choice, even though he's a dirty socialist.

[foofnik]

I just want it to be tomorrow and be over

[Tony]

Great thing about Nevada ballots is we have a "none of the above" option.

[lightupdadarkness]

End of the world party tonight at my house!

[Matthew]

Canada next super power. Book it.

[Shoalzie]

I'm voting tonight after work. I can say with confidence the person I'm voting for won't win but that's okay.

why do you support him?

I think he means hes voting a 3rd party candidate outside of trump Hilary

My political leanings fit the libertarian platform...smaller government and more personal and social freedoms. If neither major party candidate fits my beliefs, why should I have to pick either one? I'm tired of hearing a 3rd or 4th party vote is a wasted vote. Not voting for what you believe in is a wasted vote. Unfortunately, liberals feel that way and to me, that's not a very progressive way of thinking.

(I guess I've revealed who I'm voting for without actually saying it)

Plus, my vote only decides which candidate wins the electoral votes in my home state...it's not a national or popular vote. In that sense, if you don't for the person who wins your state...those votes are thrown away. It's a weird system we have.

I voted libertarian last election so this isn't me being a rebel or contrarian for this particular election. I wish more people voted for what they wanted rather than just voting for the "lesser of two evils". The party system is the true evil.

[CasperX22]

I'll be damned if I waste my time with a meaningless activity like voting.

[Monk]

I'm voting tonight after work. I can say with confidence the person I'm voting for won't win but that's okay.

why do you support him?

I think he means hes voting a 3rd party candidate outside of trump Hilary

My political leanings fit the libertarian platform...smaller government and more personal and social freedoms. If neither major party candidate fits my beliefs, why should I have to pick either one? I'm tired of hearing a 3rd or 4th party vote is a wasted vote. Not voting for what you believe in is a wasted vote. Unfortunately, liberals feel that way and to me, that's not a very progressive way of thinking.

(I guess I've revealed who I'm voting for without actually saying it)

Plus, my vote only decides which candidate wins the electoral votes in my home state...it's not a national or popular vote. In that sense, if you don't for the person who wins your state...those votes are thrown away. It's a weird system we have.

I voted libertarian last election so this isn't me being a rebel or contrarian for this particular election. I wish more people voted for what they wanted rather than just voting for the "lesser of two evils". The party system is the true evil.

blows my mind how there is only two actual candidates that will win, we have 3 fairly strong parties in canada, plus a green party that is starting to gain traction in small increments, but they at least have 1 seat i believe, its not much but its better than nothing... i know 3 is not so much more than a choice of 2 but the more options you have the better equipped you are to pick someone that can enact some good change

on a side note i just recently had a discussion with a friend who works with a libretarian here in vancouver, pretty different kind of ideals, not entirely sure if i agree or disagree but just goes to show how narrow minded politics are in the states (no offense) not much better in canada but like i said the more choices the better.. if your party had a leader that you could get behind this would be the election where libretarians could actually make some noise against two shit candidates, good luck Scott!

[kimmer]

Lol
Hi monk

[Matthew]

Proportional representation...where all votes matter.

[Monk]

Lol
Hi monk

hi

[CasperX22]

I'm voting tonight after work. I can say with confidence the person I'm voting for won't win but that's okay.

why do you support him?

I think he means hes voting a 3rd party candidate outside of trump Hilary

My political leanings fit the libertarian platform...smaller government and more personal and social freedoms. If neither major party candidate fits my beliefs, why should I have to pick either one? I'm tired of hearing a 3rd or 4th party vote is a wasted vote. Not voting for what you believe in is a wasted vote. Unfortunately, liberals feel that way and to me, that's not a very progressive way of thinking.

(I guess I've revealed who I'm voting for without actually saying it)

Plus, my vote only decides which candidate wins the electoral votes in my home state...it's not a national or popular vote. In that sense, if you don't for the person who wins your state...those votes are thrown away. It's a weird system we have.

I voted libertarian last election so this isn't me being a rebel or contrarian for this particular election. I wish more people voted for what they wanted rather than just voting for the "lesser of two evils". The party system is the true evil.

blows my mind how there is only two actual candidates that will win, we have 3 fairly strong parties in canada, plus a green party that is starting to gain traction in small increments, but they at least have 1 seat i believe, its not much but its better than nothing... i know 3 is not so much more than a choice of 2 but the more options you have the better equipped you are to pick someone that can enact some good change

on a side note i just recently had a discussion with a friend who works with a libretarian here in vancouver, pretty different kind of ideals, not entirely sure if i agree or disagree but just goes to show how narrow minded politics are in the states (no offense) not much better in canada but like i said the more choices the better.. if your party had a leader that you could get behind this would be the election where libretarians could actually make some noise against two shit candidates, good luck Scott!

It's always garbage in garbage out. It's meaningless. Politicians don't matter. Not a single one.

[hong57]

where's a good website to have the latest presidential election updates

[Tony]

ratemypoo.com

[Lee]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeFYhuWm-xk