2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Anything goes here OT stuff is OK too!
BUTTON_POST_REPLY
User avatar
hong57
PostsCOLON 7106
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by hong57 »

Matthew wroteCOLONCould be 2 Canadian teams on the Cf. That doesn't happen too often anymore.

Could be the first Canadian cup since Montreal in...'93?
but seems NSH and WSH/PIT are the favourite though...
Image
#91 - John Tavares
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by Matthew »

hong57 wroteCOLON
Matthew wroteCOLONCould be 2 Canadian teams on the Cf. That doesn't happen too often anymore.

Could be the first Canadian cup since Montreal in...'93?
but seems NSH and WSH/PIT are the favourite though...
True. Edmonton can have all the offence they want but nsh still has a top 4 of

Subban-josi
Ekholm-ellis
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
CasperX22
PostsCOLON 6136
JoinedCOLON Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:37 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by CasperX22 »

Matthew wroteCOLONCould be 2 Canadian teams on the Cf. That doesn't happen too often anymore.

Could be the first Canadian cup since Montreal in...'93?
And nobody would watch it.
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by Matthew »

CasperX22 wroteCOLON
Matthew wroteCOLONCould be 2 Canadian teams on the Cf. That doesn't happen too often anymore.

Could be the first Canadian cup since Montreal in...'93?
And nobody would watch it.
30 million Canadians would
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
Bruyns
PostsCOLON 7177
JoinedCOLON Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:18 am

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by Bruyns »

OTT would be a disaster for ratings, they can't even sell out their own building in the playoffs.
User avatar
hong57
PostsCOLON 7106
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by hong57 »

Matthew wroteCOLON
CasperX22 wroteCOLON
Matthew wroteCOLONCould be 2 Canadian teams on the Cf. That doesn't happen too often anymore.

Could be the first Canadian cup since Montreal in...'93?
And nobody would watch it.
30 million Canadians would
+1 person from HK
Image
#91 - John Tavares
User avatar
CasperX22
PostsCOLON 6136
JoinedCOLON Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:37 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by CasperX22 »

Bruyns wroteCOLONOTT would be a disaster for ratings, they can't even sell out their own building in the playoffs.
Exactly this. Not to mention it would be a short series. Karlsson might very well be the best player on the planet, but I don't think he can will that team past any of the remaining teams.
User avatar
hong57
PostsCOLON 7106
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by hong57 »

CasperX22 wroteCOLON
Bruyns wroteCOLONOTT would be a disaster for ratings, they can't even sell out their own building in the playoffs.
Exactly this. Not to mention it would be a short series. Pegeau might very well be the best player on the planet, but I don't think he can will that team past any of the remaining teams.
fixed
Image
#91 - John Tavares
User avatar
Bruyns
PostsCOLON 7177
JoinedCOLON Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:18 am

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by Bruyns »

With apologies to the Sens fans here since it's fun to see your fav team win, but they have lucked out big time with the playoff format.

"In a 1-8 format Ottawa would have played No. 3 Columbus, then No. 2 Pittsburgh. Instead, No. 7 Boston, No. 5 NYR."
User avatar
CasperX22
PostsCOLON 6136
JoinedCOLON Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:37 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by CasperX22 »

Not to mention Boston catching the injury bug.
Sensfanjosh
PostsCOLON 4043
JoinedCOLON Sun Nov 06, 2011 5:09 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by Sensfanjosh »

With all due respect to Leaf fans, no one cares about your post-elimination posturing, the rules are the rules and the NHL plays its games according to them. Saying they should be different doesn't change reality.
Image
User avatar
hong57
PostsCOLON 7106
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by hong57 »

Bruyns wroteCOLONWith apologies to the Sens fans here since it's fun to see your fav team win, but they have lucked out big time with the playoff format.

"In a 1-8 format Ottawa would have played No. 3 Columbus, then No. 2 Pittsburgh. Instead, No. 7 Boston, No. 5 NYR."
honestly WSH should try placing at WC1.. they'd have a much easier route
Image
#91 - John Tavares
User avatar
hong57
PostsCOLON 7106
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by hong57 »

Sensfanjosh wroteCOLONWith all due respect to Leaf fans, no one cares about your post-elimination posturing, the rules are the rules and the NHL plays its games according to them. Saying they should be different doesn't change reality.
i don't like seeing WSH/PIT 2nd round each year... ya rivalry.. fk that.. NHL is boring seeing the same 2nd round each year
Image
#91 - John Tavares
User avatar
CasperX22
PostsCOLON 6136
JoinedCOLON Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:37 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by CasperX22 »

Columbus wouldn't have been any tougher of a matchup than the Rangers though imo. I suspect that team massively overachieved in the regular season.
User avatar
Arian The Insider
PostsCOLON 7304
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:05 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by Arian The Insider »

Surprised the Sens made it this far. Karlsson is a beast..
Click Oilers image below for full team roster
Image
User avatar
CasperX22
PostsCOLON 6136
JoinedCOLON Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:37 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by CasperX22 »

hong57 wroteCOLON
Sensfanjosh wroteCOLONWith all due respect to Leaf fans, no one cares about your post-elimination posturing, the rules are the rules and the NHL plays its games according to them. Saying they should be different doesn't change reality.
i don't like seeing WSH/PIT 2nd round each year... ya rivalry.. fk that.. NHL is boring seeing the same 2nd round each year
I prefer this format. You should 1st have to beat your rivals because professional teams build their teams with their rivals in mind how to beat them. Then you win your conference. Then you win the cup. Sure you get some weird seeding sometimes like this season, but I would prefer to have rivals playing each other in the playoffs.
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by Matthew »

CasperX22 wroteCOLON
hong57 wroteCOLON
Sensfanjosh wroteCOLONWith all due respect to Leaf fans, no one cares about your post-elimination posturing, the rules are the rules and the NHL plays its games according to them. Saying they should be different doesn't change reality.
i don't like seeing WSH/PIT 2nd round each year... ya rivalry.. fk that.. NHL is boring seeing the same 2nd round each year
I prefer this format. You should 1st have to beat your rivals because professional teams build their teams with their rivals in mind how to beat them. Then you win your conference. Then you win the cup. Sure you get some weird seeding sometimes like this season, but I would prefer to have rivals playing each other in the playoffs.
1st time we have ever agreed.

The best playing team from either conference gets to the finals regardless.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
Bruyns
PostsCOLON 7177
JoinedCOLON Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:18 am

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by Bruyns »

The crossover screws that up though and goes against that rivalry angle.
User avatar
Bruyns
PostsCOLON 7177
JoinedCOLON Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:18 am

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by Bruyns »

Sensfanjosh wroteCOLONWith all due respect to Leaf fans, no one cares about your post-elimination posturing, the rules are the rules and the NHL plays its games according to them. Saying they should be different doesn't change reality.
Those weren't the rules for most of my hockey watching life though so I think discussing it is warranted.

Just be happy we didn't get the chance to beat you in the first round :D
User avatar
CasperX22
PostsCOLON 6136
JoinedCOLON Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:37 pm

Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion

Post by CasperX22 »

Bruyns wroteCOLONThe crossover screws that up though and goes against that rivalry angle.
Well, I would have preferred they had gone with the original plan of 4 playoff teams per division rather than the 3,3, 2 WC format. Perhaps they revisit that when the divisions become balanced.
BUTTON_POST_REPLY

Return to