but seems NSH and WSH/PIT are the favourite though...Matthew wroteCOLONCould be 2 Canadian teams on the Cf. That doesn't happen too often anymore.
Could be the first Canadian cup since Montreal in...'93?
2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
#91 - John Tavares
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
True. Edmonton can have all the offence they want but nsh still has a top 4 ofhong57 wroteCOLONbut seems NSH and WSH/PIT are the favourite though...Matthew wroteCOLONCould be 2 Canadian teams on the Cf. That doesn't happen too often anymore.
Could be the first Canadian cup since Montreal in...'93?
Subban-josi
Ekholm-ellis
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
And nobody would watch it.Matthew wroteCOLONCould be 2 Canadian teams on the Cf. That doesn't happen too often anymore.
Could be the first Canadian cup since Montreal in...'93?
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
30 million Canadians wouldCasperX22 wroteCOLONAnd nobody would watch it.Matthew wroteCOLONCould be 2 Canadian teams on the Cf. That doesn't happen too often anymore.
Could be the first Canadian cup since Montreal in...'93?
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
OTT would be a disaster for ratings, they can't even sell out their own building in the playoffs.
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
+1 person from HKMatthew wroteCOLON30 million Canadians wouldCasperX22 wroteCOLONAnd nobody would watch it.Matthew wroteCOLONCould be 2 Canadian teams on the Cf. That doesn't happen too often anymore.
Could be the first Canadian cup since Montreal in...'93?
#91 - John Tavares
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
Exactly this. Not to mention it would be a short series. Karlsson might very well be the best player on the planet, but I don't think he can will that team past any of the remaining teams.Bruyns wroteCOLONOTT would be a disaster for ratings, they can't even sell out their own building in the playoffs.
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
fixedCasperX22 wroteCOLONExactly this. Not to mention it would be a short series. Pegeau might very well be the best player on the planet, but I don't think he can will that team past any of the remaining teams.Bruyns wroteCOLONOTT would be a disaster for ratings, they can't even sell out their own building in the playoffs.
#91 - John Tavares
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
With apologies to the Sens fans here since it's fun to see your fav team win, but they have lucked out big time with the playoff format.
"In a 1-8 format Ottawa would have played No. 3 Columbus, then No. 2 Pittsburgh. Instead, No. 7 Boston, No. 5 NYR."
"In a 1-8 format Ottawa would have played No. 3 Columbus, then No. 2 Pittsburgh. Instead, No. 7 Boston, No. 5 NYR."
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
Not to mention Boston catching the injury bug.
-
- PostsCOLON 4043
- JoinedCOLON Sun Nov 06, 2011 5:09 pm
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
With all due respect to Leaf fans, no one cares about your post-elimination posturing, the rules are the rules and the NHL plays its games according to them. Saying they should be different doesn't change reality.
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
honestly WSH should try placing at WC1.. they'd have a much easier routeBruyns wroteCOLONWith apologies to the Sens fans here since it's fun to see your fav team win, but they have lucked out big time with the playoff format.
"In a 1-8 format Ottawa would have played No. 3 Columbus, then No. 2 Pittsburgh. Instead, No. 7 Boston, No. 5 NYR."
#91 - John Tavares
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
i don't like seeing WSH/PIT 2nd round each year... ya rivalry.. fk that.. NHL is boring seeing the same 2nd round each yearSensfanjosh wroteCOLONWith all due respect to Leaf fans, no one cares about your post-elimination posturing, the rules are the rules and the NHL plays its games according to them. Saying they should be different doesn't change reality.
#91 - John Tavares
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
Columbus wouldn't have been any tougher of a matchup than the Rangers though imo. I suspect that team massively overachieved in the regular season.
- Arian The Insider
- PostsCOLON 7304
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:05 pm
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
Surprised the Sens made it this far. Karlsson is a beast..
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
I prefer this format. You should 1st have to beat your rivals because professional teams build their teams with their rivals in mind how to beat them. Then you win your conference. Then you win the cup. Sure you get some weird seeding sometimes like this season, but I would prefer to have rivals playing each other in the playoffs.hong57 wroteCOLONi don't like seeing WSH/PIT 2nd round each year... ya rivalry.. fk that.. NHL is boring seeing the same 2nd round each yearSensfanjosh wroteCOLONWith all due respect to Leaf fans, no one cares about your post-elimination posturing, the rules are the rules and the NHL plays its games according to them. Saying they should be different doesn't change reality.
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
1st time we have ever agreed.CasperX22 wroteCOLONI prefer this format. You should 1st have to beat your rivals because professional teams build their teams with their rivals in mind how to beat them. Then you win your conference. Then you win the cup. Sure you get some weird seeding sometimes like this season, but I would prefer to have rivals playing each other in the playoffs.hong57 wroteCOLONi don't like seeing WSH/PIT 2nd round each year... ya rivalry.. fk that.. NHL is boring seeing the same 2nd round each yearSensfanjosh wroteCOLONWith all due respect to Leaf fans, no one cares about your post-elimination posturing, the rules are the rules and the NHL plays its games according to them. Saying they should be different doesn't change reality.
The best playing team from either conference gets to the finals regardless.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
The crossover screws that up though and goes against that rivalry angle.
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
Those weren't the rules for most of my hockey watching life though so I think discussing it is warranted.Sensfanjosh wroteCOLONWith all due respect to Leaf fans, no one cares about your post-elimination posturing, the rules are the rules and the NHL plays its games according to them. Saying they should be different doesn't change reality.
Just be happy we didn't get the chance to beat you in the first round
Re: 2016-2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs Discussion
Well, I would have preferred they had gone with the original plan of 4 playoff teams per division rather than the 3,3, 2 WC format. Perhaps they revisit that when the divisions become balanced.Bruyns wroteCOLONThe crossover screws that up though and goes against that rivalry angle.