expansion draft
Re: expansion draft
Contracts do not matter in here I think, if you own a player they are always yours. As long as they meet 40/70 requirement you should be good. At least that's my understanding.
Re: expansion draft
Shoalzie wroteCOLONkoomzzz wroteCOLONare our rules for this somewhat finalized? do contracts matter for our exposure requirements or just games played in the previous season or 2?
We're honoring the 40/70 exposure rule and we're using the exempt list from CapFriendly. The only things we're not acknowledging is NMC or long term injuries.
Any player that isn't under contract this season (rookie or veteran) is exempt from the draft.
In short, the only players eligible for the draft are any players under contract (for this season) that don't fall under the 1st/2nd year pro rule. (See CapFriendly for the exempt list).
- lightupdadarkness
- PostsCOLON 4881
- JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: expansion draft
It was posted some time ago that a UFA would count as long as it's believed that will get another contract so basically eliminating old guys.dave1959 wroteCOLONShoalzie wroteCOLONkoomzzz wroteCOLONare our rules for this somewhat finalized? do contracts matter for our exposure requirements or just games played in the previous season or 2?
We're honoring the 40/70 exposure rule and we're using the exempt list from CapFriendly. The only things we're not acknowledging is NMC or long term injuries.
Any player that isn't under contract this season (rookie or veteran) is exempt from the draft.
In short, the only players eligible for the draft are any players under contract (for this season) that don't fall under the 1st/2nd year pro rule. (See CapFriendly for the exempt list).
This has changed?
Re: expansion draft
He means a contract last season. So the player can be ufa or rfa right now.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
- lightupdadarkness
- PostsCOLON 4881
- JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: expansion draft
are there any players that need to be protected while still being waiver exempts or do the two things exclude each other because of their requirements?
Re: expansion draft
I really don't know how Scott could have made it any easier for us.
He created an Expansion Tab on our spreadsheet that CLEARLY show EVERY player that is exposed to the Draft.
All we have to do is put a P beside the ones we want protected.
He created an Expansion Tab on our spreadsheet that CLEARLY show EVERY player that is exposed to the Draft.
All we have to do is put a P beside the ones we want protected.
Re: expansion draft
is that supposed to be a comment to my question? because I don't see how the two things are related
-
- PostsCOLON 4810
- JoinedCOLON Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:41 am
- LocationCOLON Wolfville, NS
Re: expansion draft
Everyone that needs to be protected is on that list mik. Some players remain waiver exempt but require expansion protection.
Re: expansion draft
Yeah, definitely, given our Bbkl waiver exempt requirements have nothing to do with how long a player spends in the AHL. AHL players that have never played an NHL game can be expansion eligible but still have years of waiver exemption in bbkl. For example, just one player on my team would be Justin Auger.kyuss wroteCOLONare there any players that need to be protected while still being waiver exempts or do the two things exclude each other because of their requirements?
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: expansion draft
Have nothing to do with each other. Expansion eligible is based on accumulated seasons per NHL guidelines, waiver exempt is NHL GP and age.kyuss wroteCOLONare there any players that need to be protected while still being waiver exempts or do the two things exclude each other because of their requirements?
Re: expansion draft
foofnik wroteCOLONHave nothing to do with each other. Expansion eligible is based on accumulated seasons per NHL guidelines, waiver exempt is NHL GP and age.kyuss wroteCOLONare there any players that need to be protected while still being waiver exempts or do the two things exclude each other because of their requirements?
In bbkl. In the NHL things can get complicated.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: expansion draft
Is this kyuss fuckin serious?... 3 days before expansion lock and asking this type of novice as fuck type question?... jesus im like the worst GM here and even i clearly know the difference. Where the fuck have u been lol in fact where the fuck are some of these guys like monk and shit they rly gonna prepare to have their entire roster exposed due to not meeting the requirement lol. Holy shit
Last edited by 1 on kimmer, edited 0 times in total.
Re: expansion draft
I don't know if Monk has done his sheet but Nick's is done.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
- Arian The Insider
- PostsCOLON 7304
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:05 pm
Re: expansion draft
YesMatthew wroteCOLONAre stolarz and mrazek both expansion eligible?
Re: expansion draft
PM me what u wud want for either
I will pay fairly
I will pay fairly
Re: expansion draft
kimmer wroteCOLONIs this kyuss fuckin serious?... 3 days before expansion lock and asking this type of novice as fuck type question?...
sorry bro, have not been sleeping enough these days and I thought it would be quicker to ask then getting my brain thinking about it while working
Re: expansion draft
Based on your deleted PM, I don't agree with that statementkimmer wroteCOLONPM me what u wud want for either
I will pay fairly