expansion draft
Re: expansion draft
Ya i deleted
Cuz casper told me what u wanted from him
Forget it moving on
Cuz casper told me what u wanted from him
Forget it moving on
Re: expansion draft
Casper asked for more than Stolarzkimmer wroteCOLONYa i deleted
Cuz casper told me what u wanted from him
Forget it moving on
Re: expansion draft
There's at least 10 teams with better goalies out there to take than a potential backup. And Tim is limited to 3. He'd be shooting himself in the foot by taking Stolarz.Matthew wroteCOLONI think stolarz would be an elite pickup for tim.
Re: expansion draft
It also depends on what teams have. Like Mik for instance, but why would Tim waste his time with his goalies when he is likely to get a really good player from Mik?foofnik wroteCOLONThere's at least 10 teams with better goalies out there to take than a potential backup. And Tim is limited to 3. He'd be shooting himself in the foot by taking Stolarz.Matthew wroteCOLONI think stolarz would be an elite pickup for tim.
Re: expansion draft
Well yeah, some of them it obviously makes more sense to take a skater instead. But there's still a ton more teams with goalies I would take ahead of Stolarz. If that's what Tim wants to do, go for it, I have Mrazek regardless. But I think he wastes value if he does.
If he had no limit on goalies it would be a different story. But with a limit of 3, Stolarz is a waste of a roster spot for him.
If he had no limit on goalies it would be a different story. But with a limit of 3, Stolarz is a waste of a roster spot for him.
Re: expansion draft
Or he could just take him as his goalie of the future. The options out there for him are mostly older stop gap starters at best, so there is at least some logic behind taking 2 veteran NHL goalies and taking a stash with his 3rd goalie. Also depends what else you are exposing which I admittedly haven't even looked into seeing what you are exposing.foofnik wroteCOLONWell yeah, some of them it obviously makes more sense to take a skater instead. But there's still a ton more teams with goalies I would take ahead of Stolarz. If that's what Tim wants to do, go for it, I have Mrazek regardless. But I think he wastes value if he does.
If he had no limit on goalies it would be a different story. But with a limit of 3, Stolarz is a waste of a roster spot for him.
Re: expansion draft
If you want goalie of the future you're grabbing a Pickard, Raanta, Korpisalo/Forsberg.
If it's who Tim wants then so be it, but I think he leaves value on the table by doing it. A late 1st next year to lose Stolarz and another piece doesn't do much for me when instead I only lose 1 piece by holding tight.
If it's who Tim wants then so be it, but I think he leaves value on the table by doing it. A late 1st next year to lose Stolarz and another piece doesn't do much for me when instead I only lose 1 piece by holding tight.
Re: expansion draft
foofnik wroteCOLONIf you want goalie of the future you're grabbing a Pickard, Raanta, Korpisalo/Forsberg.
If it's who Tim wants then so be it, but I think he leaves value on the table by doing it. A late 1st next year to lose Stolarz and another piece doesn't do much for me when instead I only lose 1 piece by holding tight.
pretty much . A late first ain't much vs a goalie
Re: expansion draft
I guess not when people stupidly pay 1sts for backup goalies.thom54 wroteCOLONfoofnik wroteCOLONIf you want goalie of the future you're grabbing a Pickard, Raanta, Korpisalo/Forsberg.
If it's who Tim wants then so be it, but I think he leaves value on the table by doing it. A late 1st next year to lose Stolarz and another piece doesn't do much for me when instead I only lose 1 piece by holding tight.
pretty much . A late first ain't much vs a goalie
Re: expansion draft
agreed, standard used to be a 2nd round ish value i think for a guy like Carter Hutton (career backup,stable, etc)CasperX22 wroteCOLONI guess not when people stupidly pay 1sts for backup goalies.thom54 wroteCOLONfoofnik wroteCOLONIf you want goalie of the future you're grabbing a Pickard, Raanta, Korpisalo/Forsberg.
If it's who Tim wants then so be it, but I think he leaves value on the table by doing it. A late 1st next year to lose Stolarz and another piece doesn't do much for me when instead I only lose 1 piece by holding tight.
pretty much . A late first ain't much vs a goalie
Re: expansion draft
Stolarz is waiver exempt for at minimum 2 more seasons. When you are taking 30 NHLers I suspect that would be extremely helpful.
Plus, as others have said, your team doesn't have great skater options available in comparison to other teams that have goalies.
Also, that guys like korpisalo/forsberg are behind Bobrovsky, while stolarz could be sharing the net with neuvirth as soon as this year.
Plus, as others have said, your team doesn't have great skater options available in comparison to other teams that have goalies.
Also, that guys like korpisalo/forsberg are behind Bobrovsky, while stolarz could be sharing the net with neuvirth as soon as this year.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |