LAK/VGK

Trades that have been confirmed on the forum and have been reviewed and processed by the league are moved here.
User avatar
The BBKL Insider
PostsCOLON 22628
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico

LAK/VGK

Post by The BBKL Insider »

To Vegas:
2017 4th Rounder (Dal)
2017 4th Rounder (cgy)
2017 4th Rounder (lak)
2017 7th Rounder (wsh)

To Los Angeles:
Vegas agrees not to Select Cody Eakin


*LAK also agreed not to make any deals until after the expansion draft.
Image
User avatar
timwebb1212
PostsCOLON 720
JoinedCOLON Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by timwebb1212 »

Yep agreed.
User avatar
Bruyns
PostsCOLON 7177
JoinedCOLON Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:18 am

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by Bruyns »

Approved
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by Matthew »

Savard or Brian elliott are a pretty sweet pickup for tim
Last edited by 1 on Matthew, edited 0 times in total.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
CasperX22
PostsCOLON 6136
JoinedCOLON Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:37 pm

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by CasperX22 »

Tim cornering the market on mid round picks.
User avatar
The BBKL Insider
PostsCOLON 22628
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by The BBKL Insider »

Matthew wroteCOLONSavard or Brian elliott are a pretty sweet pickup for tim
i will be very happy if he selects elliott over savard.
Image
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by Matthew »

I see owning luongo and elliott and a young prospect goalie as a pretty elite goaltending for tim. He will have enough good dmen ( like 12) that he can always consolidate them and have a good defense without taking savard.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
The BBKL Insider
PostsCOLON 22628
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by The BBKL Insider »

im not gonna argue with that. I agree. Tim should take elliott.
Image
User avatar
Tony
PostsCOLON 11222
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm
LocationCOLON Nevada

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by Tony »

I'll take Savard... let's work something out.
Image
Click banner to view current roster and picks
Handsome&FairMike
PostsCOLON 4810
JoinedCOLON Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:41 am
LocationCOLON Wolfville, NS

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by Handsome&FairMike »

No idea why luongo would be on tim's list.
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by Matthew »

Handsome&FairMike wroteCOLONNo idea why luongo would be on tim's list.
1. He is a good goalie.
2. It leaves the gm exposed with only reimer as his goalie, he wil not meet gp, and tim can sell him one of his 3 goaltenders for a premium.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
Bruyns
PostsCOLON 7177
JoinedCOLON Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:18 am

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by Bruyns »

Matthew wroteCOLON
Handsome&FairMike wroteCOLONNo idea why luongo would be on tim's list.
1. He is a good goalie.
2. It leaves the gm exposed with only reimer as his goalie, he wil not meet gp, and cliff can sell him one of his 3 goaltenders for a premium.
3. Have you seen what Cliff will have available? Unless he really is exposing Berglund and protecting Lupul.
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by Matthew »

Bruyns wroteCOLON
Matthew wroteCOLON
Handsome&FairMike wroteCOLONNo idea why luongo would be on tim's list.
1. He is a good goalie.
2. It leaves the gm exposed with only reimer as his goalie, he wil not meet gp, and cliff can sell him one of his 3 goaltenders for a premium.
3. Have you seen what Cliff will have available? Unless he really is exposing Berglund and protecting Lupul.
Can't believe he is actually doing this.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
lightupdadarkness
PostsCOLON 4881
JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by lightupdadarkness »

Like for Tim as I think Eakin will be a 4th line C unless he gets traded or switched to W
User avatar
CasperX22
PostsCOLON 6136
JoinedCOLON Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:37 pm

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by CasperX22 »

Handsome&FairMike wroteCOLONNo idea why luongo would be on tim's list.
I doubt he is taking Luongo.
User avatar
hong57
PostsCOLON 7106
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by hong57 »

The BBKL Insider wroteCOLON
Matthew wroteCOLONSavard or Brian elliott are a pretty sweet pickup for tim
i will be very happy if he selects elliott over savard.
send a 2nd to him and he will gladly take elliot
Image
#91 - John Tavares
User avatar
hong57
PostsCOLON 7106
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by hong57 »

just similar to my deal.. so i like it for LAK.. but definitely tim is in a very good position and good asset to work with
Image
#91 - John Tavares
User avatar
The BBKL Insider
PostsCOLON 22628
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by The BBKL Insider »

lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONLike for Tim as I think Eakin will be a 4th line C unless he gets traded or switched to W
Under Hitchcock he was great. Im hoping he returns to that same player. id be happy with 35-40 pts and good peripherals.

i also only have 3 Centres and didn't want to be left with 2 if he decided to select Eakin!
Image
User avatar
lightupdadarkness
PostsCOLON 4881
JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by lightupdadarkness »

Never knew he played for Hitch

Hitch was speaking about the team and he got into who he envisioned as his top 3 Cs and didn't mention him but we all know things can change
User avatar
The BBKL Insider
PostsCOLON 22628
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: LAK/VGK

Post by The BBKL Insider »

lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONNever knew he played for Hitch

Hitch was speaking about the team and he got into who he envisioned as his top 3 Cs and didn't mention him but we all know things can change
Which means Eakins goes to the wing...which sucks for me haha.

wish i had heard that before i made this deal.
Image
BUTTON_POST_REPLY

Return to