Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
My bad was available at one point.
Same with Ritchie Josh made a few smart changes imo
Same with Ritchie Josh made a few smart changes imo
- timwebb1212
- PostsCOLON 720
- JoinedCOLON Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
That's right, I think he was the pick before that.Sensfanjosh wroteCOLONProtected Johns that was why Dillon was available.
- timwebb1212
- PostsCOLON 720
- JoinedCOLON Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
Oh. Blah. Annoyed I'm losing bernier but I suppose he isn't worth much...maybe an early 2nd or later 2nd + 3rd.
And I traded orpik for baertschi + bernier, so he is worth about 1/3rd of a 36 year old dman.
Still, would have been nice to have high gp sources, even tho I would never play him.
May have been better for tim to take goalies from people who only have 2 goalies so he could sell them back for a premium as those people become desperate. He took all three of his goalies from gms who had 3 goalies so we don't need to trade to get them back. Bad strategy.
And I traded orpik for baertschi + bernier, so he is worth about 1/3rd of a 36 year old dman.
Still, would have been nice to have high gp sources, even tho I would never play him.
May have been better for tim to take goalies from people who only have 2 goalies so he could sell them back for a premium as those people become desperate. He took all three of his goalies from gms who had 3 goalies so we don't need to trade to get them back. Bad strategy.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
- timwebb1212
- PostsCOLON 720
- JoinedCOLON Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
I'm gonna need two goalies so I'm not concerned with my ability to extort GMs in need of a backup since only Stolarz will I trade without a goalie coming back
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
Oh, in that case should have taken better goalies
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
"Other considerations: brown"
He was protected.
He was protected.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
- timwebb1212
- PostsCOLON 720
- JoinedCOLON Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
I'll concede I didn't do the best job managing the goalie options. IMO that was my biggest mistake. But it didn't work out too bad.Matthew wroteCOLONOh, in that case should have taken better goalies
Luongo would've been a good option since Zona didn't expose shit for skaters
Raanta might've been a better option than Halak/Bernier, especially if Vegas takes him. Ward also is not super valuable
And I should've got more for not taking Grubauer or I should've taken him. Undersold on that one.
Other than goalies though I'm very happy with my draft.
- timwebb1212
- PostsCOLON 720
- JoinedCOLON Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
JT Brown? I thought he was exposed? Or at least he was listed as such a little before the lock, I knew I was taking a goalie from you for a long while in advance, so I honestly didn't check.Matthew wroteCOLON"Other considerations: brown"
He was protected.
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
True. You did pretty good. I believe if you can contract some of your extra pieces into a few high end pieces you can do pretty well this season!
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
I ended up protecting him and making wennberg available. You should have checked.timwebb1212 wroteCOLONJT Brown? I thought he was exposed? Or at least he was listed as such a little before the lock, I knew I was taking a goalie from you for a long while in advance, so I honestly didn't check.Matthew wroteCOLON"Other considerations: brown"
He was protected.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
- timwebb1212
- PostsCOLON 720
- JoinedCOLON Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
lol shucks, blew that one I guessMatthew wroteCOLONI ended up protecting him and making wennberg available. You should have checked.timwebb1212 wroteCOLONJT Brown? I thought he was exposed? Or at least he was listed as such a little before the lock, I knew I was taking a goalie from you for a long while in advance, so I honestly didn't check.Matthew wroteCOLON"Other considerations: brown"
He was protected.
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
Hah. I just switched brown and noesen.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
- timwebb1212
- PostsCOLON 720
- JoinedCOLON Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
my manhong57 wroteCOLONfantraxed you hjmarrssonn
- timwebb1212
- PostsCOLON 720
- JoinedCOLON Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
Haha yeah didn't really have interest in any of the guys you exposed. Prince was maybe the top skater option I guess?Matthew wroteCOLONHah. I just switched brown and noesen.
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
i was hoping tim take hammer ... i don't wanna lose ferland as i have chabot coming up and due to cap reasons.. but hammer is a very very very very very solid bbkler and in real nhler too.. and not old by any means..
#91 - John Tavares
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
and i duno if tim really seriously considered armia.. but armia is a very good piece too tbh and he was given some shtoi this year
#91 - John Tavares
- timwebb1212
- PostsCOLON 720
- JoinedCOLON Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation
I'll go ahead and put up the final pick so we can end this trade freeze