Sure! Still getting used to what we can and cannot do in this forum. I'm used to Pro Boards a little too much I think.Shoalzie wroteCOLONDa_Hawks wroteCOLONCan we sticky the draft thread, so everyone can see it's in progress? Would that help?
I made the thread global so you can see it in every forum. Sound good?
2018 Draft Discussion
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
- Shoalzie
- PostsCOLON 12673
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:28 pm
- LocationCOLON Portland, MI
- CONTACTCOLON
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
From a fantasy perspective, it makes sense. Each of the last three drafts here...only Hanifin is the only defenseman picked in the top 5. Each of those drafts, a defenseman went no earlier 6th overall...all forwards in the top 5 other than Hanifin.
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
I debated a Dman but Wahlstrom was hard to pass on. Debated him at 3 is why I paused there.
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
lol@ Owen Nolan in Draft Sheet
- Shoalzie
- PostsCOLON 12673
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:28 pm
- LocationCOLON Portland, MI
- CONTACTCOLON
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
Working on importing player data from other sheets...you must be hard up for entertainment.
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
i was looking at picks for an offer made to me
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
by the way
when you say, for example, 1.5 SJ from Chicago via LA
that means it's Chicago pick that was traded to LA then traded to SJ right?
when you say, for example, 1.5 SJ from Chicago via LA
that means it's Chicago pick that was traded to LA then traded to SJ right?
- Shoalzie
- PostsCOLON 12673
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:28 pm
- LocationCOLON Portland, MI
- CONTACTCOLON
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
San Jose acquired the Chicago pick from (or via) Los Angeles...so it's "San Jose (from CHI via LA)". He didn't get the pick directly from Chicago, he acquired it via another team.
In Matt owning Paul's pick...he acquired that right from him so that's simply "Buffalo (from CAR)".
When I put "via", it's the most recent trade that the current holder of the pick acquired the pick from. I don't put the entire chain of trades in the pick...just the most recent trade.
In the sheets such as "1st Rd Picks", it gives you an idea of the chain of trades from the original owner to the current owner. In the case of Billy getting his pick back, I like to reference the fact he re-acquired the pick from Toronto but I don't reference the trades that lead to Toronto getting the pick. I hit reset button on that chain of trades.
In Matt owning Paul's pick...he acquired that right from him so that's simply "Buffalo (from CAR)".
When I put "via", it's the most recent trade that the current holder of the pick acquired the pick from. I don't put the entire chain of trades in the pick...just the most recent trade.
In the sheets such as "1st Rd Picks", it gives you an idea of the chain of trades from the original owner to the current owner. In the case of Billy getting his pick back, I like to reference the fact he re-acquired the pick from Toronto but I don't reference the trades that lead to Toronto getting the pick. I hit reset button on that chain of trades.
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
I stand corrected!Handsome&FairMike wroteCOLONThis was I, not Lee... which I swapped to Steve for 2nd + Shipachyov which then was shipped to Paul for two additional firsts.KapG wroteCOLONLosing the lottery sucks when you don’t own your pick lmao. Lee won with mine last year from 4 or 5 hahahahaha ughhhMalette18 wroteCOLONPoor kimmer.
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
Curious to see which defensmen get drafted first here...handful of great ones will be picked soon
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
Messaged Dave
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
The disrespect for dmen is real in fantasy sports.
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
It's probably a bit more about the format of this league really. I was always planning to draft either Hughes or Boqvist at #6, preferably Hughes. I was fairly confident someone would take Tkachuk high because he could be a monster in this format, I wasn't necessarily expecting Wahlstrom or Kotkaniemi to go quite that high. Surprised Boqvist is still on the board.
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
Criminal that Boqvist is still there. Bouchard and Dobson may be more NHL studs then fantasy studs.
Re: 2018 Draft Discussion
was either taking Hughes or kot