CHI/PIT Give me novoKANE

[Shoalzie]

I think you were better off keeping Giroux...at least that's what I would've done. Not saying Kane is very good but he is heavily slanted towards the offensive numbers and doesn't do much more plus, he's been banged up a lot lately.

[Robin Hood]

I think you were better off keeping Giroux...at least that's what I would've done. Not saying Kane is very good but he is heavily slanted towards the offensive numbers and doesn't do much more plus, he's been banged up a lot lately.

giroux is nice but there is a lot of risk attached to him. he could easily end up being a 70 point player for the rest of his career. he could hit 80 too but he could just as well be a 60 point player (although the bell curve average of his future imo is around 70). kane on the other hand is almost a guarantee to put up 90 points every year and imo he can easily top 100 points (he's only 22). the way i see it i turned a #22 pick overall into a #1 overall and a franchise player at that.

the other thing is that my team is built on pure offence. my team's peripheries cannot keep up with scott or kareem or steve or shep. but i can beat them all in offence with hank, dank, dats, kane, franzen, selanne, flash etc. my whole team is full of one dimensional forwards who produce a lot of points. kane fits in perfectly. so it makes sense to me lol although i can see how others may not.