5 for 1 Superstar

Robin Hood · Post by **Robin Hood** » Mon May 16, 2011 4:37 pm

To Team X

Jussi Jokinen
Ville Leino
Andy Greene
Marc Savard
Nikolai Zherdev

To Pittsburgh

1 Player

MSP4LYFE · Post by **MSP4LYFE** » Mon May 16, 2011 4:44 pm

You are on crack if you think anyone will give up a superstar for that package of second and third rate talent.

Robin Hood · Post by **Robin Hood** » Mon May 16, 2011 4:45 pm

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONYou are on crack if you think anyone will give up a superstar for that package of second and third rate talent.

doesnt have to be a superstar like eric staal. i guess i should rephrase. a good benchmark would be a guy like pavelski

anton · Post by **anton** » Mon May 16, 2011 4:52 pm

whenever you post these you keep operating under the assumption that savard has any value left at all.

there is no way in frosty hell you get a joe pavelski like player for that.

MSP4LYFE · Post by **MSP4LYFE** » Mon May 16, 2011 4:57 pm

SuperMario wroteCOLON
MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONYou are on crack if you think anyone will give up a superstar for that package of second and third rate talent.
doesnt have to be a superstar like eric staal. i guess i should rephrase. a good benchmark would be a guy like pavelski

That is reasonable, I can see Pavelski going for a package like that, in fact Leino alone is a very similar player, minus the fow of course.

MSP4LYFE · Post by **MSP4LYFE** » Mon May 16, 2011 4:58 pm

anton wroteCOLONwhenever you post these you keep operating under the assumption that savard has any value left at all.

there is no way in frosty hell you get a joe pavelski like player for that.

Leino and Jokinen alone is a very reasonable offer for Joe Pavelski. It is certainly not unreasonable of Shiv to claim as much.

Nick · Post by **Nick** » Mon May 16, 2011 5:10 pm

Maybe stats wise... But they are no where near the players or future impact that medium Joe is.

MSP4LYFE · Post by **MSP4LYFE** » Mon May 16, 2011 5:14 pm

facey wroteCOLONMaybe stats wise... But they are no where near the players or future impact that medium Joe is.

This is a stats based league, and I disagree that the future impact is so radically different between the three of them, I think for the most part each of them has reached their career potential, their may be some career years mixed in there, but for the most part what they are today, is what they will be moving forward, IMO.

Post by **Shep** » Mon May 16, 2011 5:57 pm

I have nothing that equals that package.

SORRY BUD

Post by **The BBKL Insider** » Mon May 16, 2011 6:56 pm

anton · Post by **anton** » Mon May 16, 2011 7:24 pm

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON
That is reasonable, I can see Pavelski going for a package like that, in fact Leino alone is a very similar player, minus the fow of course.

on what planet exactly?

http://bbkl.hockey.cbssports.com/player ... :p/scoring?

tyler · Post by **tyler** » Mon May 16, 2011 7:28 pm

"im gonna make a retarded offer. not sure if it's what you're looking for. let me know if any minor tweaks can make it happen (swapping players out etc).

To Vancouver: Ville Leino + Andy Greene + Ryan Ellis + Marc Savard + Nikolai Zherdev
To Pittsburgh: Couture"

Nick · Post by **Nick** » Mon May 16, 2011 7:56 pm

Couture

Problem with that offer Shiv is that next year it could easily be Leino + Greene...

Scott · Post by **Scott** » Mon May 16, 2011 8:24 pm

Don't be retarded Berg.

Robin Hood · Post by **Robin Hood** » Mon May 16, 2011 8:47 pm

I fail to see how that is a bad offer lol. Leinos good for 50 points, Greene is a good h2h d-man, Ellis could be a beast ppqb, and yes Zherdev is a flight risk to the KHL but he will more than likely stay in the nhl and that means a 3rd NHL asset for berg in return for Couture. Savard is a huge risk yes but the other 4 pieces in return for couture mean Savard's return is just a cherry on top if it happens.

That being said, I can see why berg would reject it if there are better offers out there.

But posting it as if its ridiculous is kind of unnecessary.

anton · Post by **anton** » Mon May 16, 2011 8:55 pm

SuperMario wroteCOLONI fail to see how that is a bad offer lol. Leinos good for 50 points, Greene is a good h2h d-man, Ellis could be a beast ppqb, and yes Zherdev is a flight risk to the KHL but he will more than likely stay in the nhl and that means a 3rd NHL asset for berg in return for Couture. Savard is a huge risk yes but the other 4 pieces in return for couture mean Savard's return is just a cherry on top if it happens.

That being said, I can see why berg would reject it if there are better offers out there.

But posting it as if its ridiculous is kind of unnecessary.

you might be onto something, but in reality you've picked the worst possible time to have that offer accepted.

couture is a rookie, ripping up the playoffs, coming off a likely calder year, at the peak of his hype less than a few days after berg acquired him.

it's simply not going to happen.

Scott · Post by **Scott** » Mon May 16, 2011 8:57 pm

Besides quality>quantity

anton · Post by **anton** » Mon May 16, 2011 9:02 pm

ill give ya heatley for leino, jokinen, ellis, ATL 1st

Robin Hood · Post by **Robin Hood** » Mon May 16, 2011 9:02 pm

anton wroteCOLONill give ya heatley for leino, jokinen, ellis, ATL 1st

lol no.

Post by **The BBKL Insider** » Mon May 16, 2011 9:15 pm

bergey wroteCOLON"im gonna make a retarded offer. not sure if it's what you're looking for. let me know if any minor tweaks can make it happen (swapping players out etc).

To Vancouver: Ville Leino + Andy Greene + Ryan Ellis + Marc Savard + Nikolai Zherdev
To Pittsburgh: Couture"

don't be facking stupid Berg

Buds Board Keepers League

5 for 1 Superstar

5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar

Re: 5 for 1 Superstar