Kulemin: 2 years x 2.35
Re: Kulemin: 2 years x 2.35
Yep, good deal. Too bad it wasn't longer though.
Re: Kulemin: 2 years x 2.35
Yep..4 years at at 2.35 wouldve been golden. Eat away some UFA years.MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONSucks that it is only 2 years, but w.e
Re: Kulemin: 2 years x 2.35
ye, I cannot blame kules for dodging a 4 year deal at that rate... was pretty sure he would have wanted closer to 3 if we wanted more term.
- Robin Hood
- PostsCOLON 13589
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:09 pm
Re: Kulemin: 2 years x 2.35
i think we dodged a HUGE bullet. Why did kulemins agent not ask: how is armstrong is worth 3 and kulemin is worth 2.35
Re: Kulemin: 2 years x 2.35
SuperMario wroteCOLONi think we dodged a HUGE bullet. Why did kulemins agent not ask: how is armstrong is worth 3 and kulemin is worth 2.35
Proven track record, more grit, more leadership, UFA not RFA... Colby put up those #'s in a true 3rd line role, Kules put up similar season totals, but almost solely with top end line-mates (10 or 11 game pt streak I believe).
Cannot compare RFA to UFA, and really, Kulemin is a unique case IMO... even @ 2.35M we are expecting him to play like the final 20 and not the previous 131 games for us.