Buds Board Keepers League

thom54 wroteCOLONNYR (better coach and goalie)
LAK (Better goalie, and love the Gabby acquisition)

Crawford was great vs Minnesota though

kyuss wroteCOLON

thom54 wroteCOLONNYR (better coach and goalie)
LAK (Better goalie, and love the Gabby acquisition)

Crawford was great vs Minnesota though

No doubt, but I would place Quick as easily a superior goalie.

i am stanley cup bound!!

GKG!

Shutup ...

Want the kings to win.

free banner for me.

The BBKL Insider wroteCOLONWant the kings to win.

free banner for me.

$200 buck possible for me....

I need Gabby, Voynov and Zucs to rack up some points.

I'm in 5th right now, 2 pts out of 3rd...3 out of 2nd...and 11 back from first

Sorry Anton ... I'm still bitter. I'm usually over it by now. Would be pretty fucking cool to be in your position right now.

Want NYR to win, but they'll probably get swept.

i'm not even a Rangers fan but it's disappointing seeing them go down 2-0 this way, instead of having the final series tied at one.

That 3rd goal that put the Kings back on track should have been disallowed.

Lundqvist also made a bad mistake on his own previously.

kyuss wroteCOLONi'm not even a Rangers fan but it's disappointing seeing them go down 2-0 this way, instead of having the final series tied at one.

That 3rd goal that put the Kings back on track should have been disallowed.

Lundqvist also made a bad mistake on his own previously.

He couldn't make the save so by that definition should be disallowed, however looks like McD pushed that kings player into lundqvist, does that make a difference if the goal should be allowed? This is where a challenge flag would be useful, fucking nhl brass has to be the slowest of all the major sports leagues to adapt new rules

I say go back to not even a toe in the crease.....

Messier.

Brett. Hull.

Dallas Stars - 1999 Stanley Cup Champions*

Monk wroteCOLON

kyuss wroteCOLONi'm not even a Rangers fan but it's disappointing seeing them go down 2-0 this way, instead of having the final series tied at one.

That 3rd goal that put the Kings back on track should have been disallowed.

Lundqvist also made a bad mistake on his own previously.

He couldn't make the save so by that definition should be disallowed, however looks like McD pushed that kings player into lundqvist, does that make a difference if the goal should be allowed?

I am all for allowing goals when it's the defenseman to create the goalie interference, like when it's the D pushing/crosschecking the F into the crease to begin with, but that was not the case here.

Monk wroteCOLONThis is where a challenge flag would be useful...

obvious agreement here

A complete joke they didnt call that goal back.

Ye. Pretty badly missed called.

pfffffff-HAHAHAAAAaaaa

her name's hannah lol. she was ok - her face didn't actually hit that hard. the girl just to the right of the reporter is my favorite (forget her name) - she just laughs and walks away.

so rick nash eh

Jesus...that looked terrible!