GDP Week 7
Re: GDP Week 7
I think pim is actually kinda a fun stat to have. I just really dislike +/- as an individual stat. Maybe it is time we considered adding an advanced stat ?
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: GDP Week 7
Maybe we should add a stat that tracks beard hairs.
It would make players like Radko Gudas more valuable while making Sidney Crosby less valuable.
Deep state advanced stats.
It would make players like Radko Gudas more valuable while making Sidney Crosby less valuable.
Deep state advanced stats.
Re: GDP Week 7
I've always wondered why neuvirth is never given a chance as a starter. His stats always seem to be quite good.koomzzz wroteCOLONmaybe 4 straight losses will yield a fucking Neuvirth start
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: GDP Week 7
Well, he had a chance to take a stranglehold on the job an then can down with an illness. Elliott had a couple of really good starts to follow.koomzzz wroteCOLONmaybe 4 straight losses will yield a fucking Neuvirth start
Re: GDP Week 7
I'd be more on board with replacing +- then PIMs since +- has no affect on player value.
Re: GDP Week 7
My vote is for even strength ptsBruyns wroteCOLONI'd be more on board with replacing +- then PIMs since +- has no affect on player value.
- The BBKL Insider
- PostsCOLON 22628
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
- LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: GDP Week 7
I love it.CasperX22 wroteCOLONMy vote is for even strength ptsBruyns wroteCOLONI'd be more on board with replacing +- then PIMs since +- has no affect on player value.
-
- PostsCOLON 4810
- JoinedCOLON Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:41 am
- LocationCOLON Wolfville, NS
Re: GDP Week 7
Don’t we already have even strength points sorta covered with STP and points? I could see splitting STP into pp and shorty points and then make points just even strength points? But I don’t really like it to be honest. Don’t see why +/- is so bad.
Re: GDP Week 7
No we don't because STP has nothing to do with even strength and pts are just a sum of all parts. It gives value to different types of players by splitting es, pp, and sh into 3 seperate categories. Es scoring would give value to some of the better players in the NHL that don't necessarily see a ton of time on special teams.Handsome&FairMike wroteCOLONDon’t we already have even strength points sorta covered with STP and points? I could see splitting STP into pp and shorty points and then make points just even strength points? But I don’t really like it to be honest. Don’t see why +/- is so bad.
And +/- is the most useless stat ever attached to an individual players performance. Devalues good players that are stuck on bad teams.