Is he really? Policy has some kinks I guess.kimmer wroteCOLONit's crazy how mcd is a winger. dam
BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
very clearly does. McDavid has taken the 3rd most FOs on his team.Da_Hawks wroteCOLONIs he really? Policy has some kinks I guess.kimmer wroteCOLONit's crazy how mcd is a winger. dam
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
He plays an unreal amount of minutes. He's not even good at taking draws haha.koomzzz wroteCOLONvery clearly does. McDavid has taken the 3rd most FOs on his team.Da_Hawks wroteCOLONIs he really? Policy has some kinks I guess.kimmer wroteCOLONit's crazy how mcd is a winger. dam
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
Weal still a C in my sheet for week 11 tab, so listing him as a C but have room to move him to W so I'm legal. FT set correctly.
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
I'll make the chances b4 7pm
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
Jason Dickinson still a C in my sheet for week 11 tab, so listing him as a C but have room to move him to W so I'm legal. FT set correctly.
(Thanks to Foof for the template haha)
(Thanks to Foof for the template haha)
- Shoalzie
- PostsCOLON 12673
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:28 pm
- LocationCOLON Portland, MI
- CONTACTCOLON
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
If there's any additional position changes needed on Google, I'll get to them tonight.
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
forgot to confirm about Chytil and Paul:
Chytil did play his 20th game before the lock, hence the update W --> C is confirmed
Same for Nick Paul, as his FOR stayed slightly over .45: before the last two games (the ones played this week) his FOR was in fact 167 FOT / 370.5 mins = .451
Chytil did play his 20th game before the lock, hence the update W --> C is confirmed
Same for Nick Paul, as his FOR stayed slightly over .45: before the last two games (the ones played this week) his FOR was in fact 167 FOT / 370.5 mins = .451
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
Asplund has been changed to dual, but he should be a center.
Thanks, mik. Muchly appreciated.
Thanks, mik. Muchly appreciated.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
For some reason Tobias Rieder is now listed as C/W
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
Fucking Fantrax, apparently they were impressed with his 22% winning ratio lol
fixed.
fixed.
- Shoalzie
- PostsCOLON 12673
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:28 pm
- LocationCOLON Portland, MI
- CONTACTCOLON
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
When is our next position update? I've got Curtis Lazar looking like a sure-fire change from W to C.
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
in the previous two seasons it was performed on February 20th and 21st, so around that date during the week that runs from 17th through 23rd, obviously ahead of the trade deadline
- Shoalzie
- PostsCOLON 12673
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:28 pm
- LocationCOLON Portland, MI
- CONTACTCOLON
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
We have 4:00 p.m. faceoffs on Monday so we'll probably want to get this squared away soon if this last review is being done for Week 20.
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
Scott Laughton is suddenly showing as a W in Fantrax
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
Has anyone done an analysis to make sure the current FOR is providing an adequate distribution of W vs C?
I've done from 4 Cs to 2 because of this awful calculation, and it's fucking with my GP again.
I've done from 4 Cs to 2 because of this awful calculation, and it's fucking with my GP again.
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
the W/C update is underway, Laughton's FOR is 0.41 so he's going to be a W through the rest of the seasondave1959 wroteCOLONScott Laughton is suddenly showing as a W in Fantrax
- Jordan (VGK)
- PostsCOLON 1062
- JoinedCOLON Wed Sep 27, 2017 1:29 pm
- LocationCOLON Ottawa, ON
Re: BBKL policy for Centers and Wingers
I've done it for other leagues where we use 0.40. The amount of C's available was roughly 5.something per team. Enough to go around when contenders have 6 and rebuilders have 3.Da_Hawks wroteCOLONHas anyone done an analysis to make sure the current FOR is providing an adequate distribution of W vs C?
I've done from 4 Cs to 2 because of this awful calculation, and it's fucking with my GP again.
0.45 likely limits that pool a bit.