Buds Board Keepers League

Hey Lee:

Lol getting destroyed by Bergie

fine ... I'll take your first you big baby ... yeesh

Has the bbkl developed parity this season or what.. soo many good teams.

Chuck's been very impressive in the early going. No surprise that two players (Datsyuk & Neal) that helped Anton win the title are helping Chuck in the early going.

bills09 wroteCOLONHas the bbkl developed parity this season or what.. soo many good teams.

Good group of GMs, we have.

bills09 wroteCOLONHas the bbkl developed parity this season or what.. soo many good teams.

I think in those matchups between contenders, you'll see more close matchups. I don't think you want to get blown out because it will be hard to make up lost points in a shortened season. Scraping out 7, 8 or 9 wins a week should probably get you in the playoffs and the occasion double-digit win week will move you up the standings. It definitely puts an emphasis on beating the lesser teams and collect those perceived "easy" points. You don't want too many clunkers...5 wins or less.

New York Islanders ... the Los Angeles Kings of BBKL

all I need is the 8th seed to get cha!!

is neel still existant? He doesn't have RNH or Justin Schultz dressed on his active lineup.

Peter wroteCOLONis neel still existant? He doesn't have RNH or Justin Schultz dressed on his active lineup.

No, there is no GM there. They aren't playing due to lack of cap space.

Mike wroteCOLON

Peter wroteCOLONis neel still existant? He doesn't have RNH or Justin Schultz dressed on his active lineup.

No, there is no GM there. They aren't playing due to lack of cap space.

Damn, some nice pieces on that team too, such a waste.

That still doesn't make sense. Even if the GM isnt there, that lineup isnt 100% competitive. Why would neither of those players have priority over some of the others on that roster? (Lombari and Blum over RNH and Schultz causes cap hit overage?). I thought GM-less teams are supposed to be taken care of to emulate best possible match and competition by means of setting up the strongest lineup

gooker wroteCOLONThat still doesn't make sense. Even if the GM isnt there, that lineup isnt 100% competitive. Why would neither of those players have priority over some of the others on that roster? (Lombari and Blum over RNH and Schultz causes cap hit overage?). I thought GM-less teams are supposed to be taken care of to emulate best possible match and competition by means of setting up the strongest lineup

Try to do a better job than I did without waiving anyone: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... MNmc#gid=0

WAIVE THEM FUCKERS

Find a new gm

Peter wroteCOLONFind a new gm

Thought I could at least tie you Mike, not looking good. My goalie stats saved me. Losing three players To IR and another to a scratch was the deciding factor in this match, I feel. Probably would have been a fair tie, which i am fine with. Stupid injuries.

Tony wroteCOLON

Peter wroteCOLONFind a new gm

mr. bruin wroteCOLONThought I could at least tie you Mike, not looking good. My goalie stats saved me. Losing three players To IR and another to a scratch was the deciding factor in this match, I feel. Probably would have been a fair tie, which i am fine with. Stupid injuries.

+/-, assists, blocks, GWG, points, STPTS... maybe goals... all up for grabs.

Why are you conceding so early?

Lol. Just saw score and would really love a tie. We are pretty even really. I need a bit more depth though. I believe all our matches are just like this. Never blowouts.

PS Can you tell me how I edit the html table to populate my IR. I don't know where to put the names. The one in my sign you showed us to do earlier.