Buds Board Keepers League

about #1, this was what the CC chief at the time said:

I was not aware of this rule. I never really looked tbh as it doesnt affect me. I was under the impression that any stats accrued after the 4th start do not count. In other words once 4 starts was reached both goalies were benched by the admins. mid week. I dont know why all goalie stats would be canceled. We cannot control the starts because we are a week long roster system. To have balance i was under the impression that no more than 4 starts would be accepted, therefore admins would bench the goalies for the remainder of the week. It is on the GM to decide if they want to risk losing the latter starts by potentially running with 2 goalies that could play that week.

but he didn't realize it was not doable on CBS and would have needed to be done manually..

whatever we decide (hopefully today), I suspect Lehto's shutout won't count.

I was under the impression that the RS rule was an overall 82 game cap rather than a weekly cap. Or at least that is what was explained to me while I was starting out.

Of those options 1 and 3 make the most sense to me. I would probably side on 3 personally. Just because there is at least some potential for an extreme measure someone could take for an advantage under #1. For example bringing in an extra starter at the deadline, that you researched that had a couple favorable early week starts in the first couple weeks of the playoffs, to play with your regular starter before you would reach the cap both weeks. Definitely a very extreme example, but the potential is there if someone got really creative looking for an advantage.

But then what happens if both had 3 starts? Remove the one with better stats? Worse stats?

So #1 is definitely cleaner. So yea both options are realistically very suitable.

thom54 wroteCOLONholy fuck a duck. I needed that SO. Still may lose, but god damned fantastic scheduling . Buffalo, @ Nash. Goldddd....OBIN!

I called that one for you.

Looks like you have this now. I need a Ducks SO against the Rangers since the only other stat I could catch you in is assists and that makes it 8-8 and you win.

Fraser wroteCOLONI was under the impression that the RS rule was an overall 82 game cap rather than a weekly cap. Or at least that is what was explained to me while I was starting out.

Of those options 1 and 3 make the most sense to me. I would probably side on 3 personally. Just because there is at least some potential for an extreme measure someone could take for an advantage under #1. For example bringing in an extra starter at the deadline, that you researched that had a couple favorable early week starts in the first couple weeks of the playoffs, to play with your regular starter before you would reach the cap both weeks. Definitely a very extreme example, but the potential is there if someone got really creative looking for an advantage.

But then what happens if both had 3 starts? Remove the one with better stats? Worse stats?

So #1 is definitely cleaner. So yea both options are realistically very suitable.

from now onward, please post here http://bbkl.ca/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=12144 on this matter

Datsyuk out again, which makes FOW a lost stat despite Colborne getting zero faceoffs last night.

On the other hand, Gunnarsson is out. Given the quick b2b Lindbohm would have been in anyway for Bortuzzo I guess, Butler is replacing Gunnarsson.

So it's
Zetterberg, Jaskin, Nyquist, Zuccarello, Ekman-Larsson, Lindbohm
Vs
Stepan alone


To complete the come back I need to gain another 'half stat', like:
winning STP (tied), or tie SOG where I'm down by 5 (still shots less as I write), or tie A (down by 1), or Hits (down by 9).


Stupid Red Wings have been screwing my week so far, and already blew a PP opportunity today.

Bruyns wroteCOLON

thom54 wroteCOLONholy fuck a duck. I needed that SO. Still may lose, but god damned fantastic scheduling . Buffalo, @ Nash. Goldddd....OBIN!

I called that one for you.

Looks like you have this now. I need a Ducks SO against the Rangers since the only other stat I could catch you in is assists and that makes it 8-8 and you win.

most likely ... albeit a random PIM explosion is always possible. See Mr. Bozak last week! Uhg... Go Rangers lol

You definitely called it, I hoped for it

Jesus Christ Zett shoot the fucking puck to the fucking net, and hit the goalie rather than the fucking posts like you've been doing this week.

Mik needs to win. Simply for the amount of posts in this thread. HE MUST WIN.
Go Mik.

guy talks a lot yea

Bunch of shit... my team doesn't show up and the Sharks suck my ass. It's going to be a long summer...

Guys, he had 6 goalie starts last week an it cost me a playoff spot as I missed by 1 point. So, we ignored it all season long.

thom54 wroteCOLONMik needs to win. Simply for the amount of posts in this thread. HE MUST WIN.
Go Mik.

I basically wasted all the advantage I had going into todays games.. my four idiots could only collect PIMs, the only stat I didn't need, unbelievable.

What looked like a 95% win this morning is now close to 50/50.

this is a tight sunday! God dammmn

No shutout for Andersen = Thom wins.

Closer week than I expected and good luck next round.

^ real long shot you could pass him in Sv% with an insane amount of shots and no more goals from here. But yea really unlikely at this point.

Fraser wroteCOLON^ real long shot you could pass him in Sv% with an insane amount of shots and no more goals from here. But yea really unlikely at this point.

He would also need to tie or win assists in that scenario.

Yup. It not happening. But its not impossible.

Ok now its over

haha