Buds Board Keepers League

Lame.

Are we allowed to expose players that are exempt? For example, can i expose Jimmy Vesey?

Not during the freeze.

The BBKL Insider wroteCOLONAre we allowed to expose players that are exempt? For example, can i expose Jimmy Vesey?

No you can't choose for exempt players to be available.

Why not? Wouldn't it just strengthen the crop of players available to tim? He doesn't need to choose them. Just say that those players can't fill one of your mandatory 40gp spots.

Matthew wroteCOLONWhy not? Wouldn't it just strengthen the crop of players available to tim? He doesn't need to choose them. Just say that those players can't fill one of your mandatory 40gp spots.

Then what would be the point of exposing them?

People just want to keep changing the rules to suit their own purposes

i wasn't changing any rules, i was asking a question.

I just don't understand the advantage Steve would get from it.

I suppose if Steve really wanted to do it he could just trade tim the player he isn't allowed to expose and in exchange tim can't choose any of his players available with any value.

Matthew wroteCOLONI suppose if Steve really wanted to do it he could just trade tim the player he isn't allowed to expose and in exchange tim can't choose any of his players available with any value.

essentially this...if Tim liked Vesey the most i could always trade him to Tim for Eakin/Savard after expansion. I was simply trying to give him another option to sway him for taking one of those 2...in the end it doesn't really matter.

Is there a thread where we Post all our protected pieces and unprotected pieces for submission?

Matthew wroteCOLONIs there a thread where we Post all our protected pieces and unprotected pieces for submission?

Nope using the SS by simply putting a P. Those who don't have a P and are eligible will automatically be exposed for Tim to pick from. Scotts making a list for him so if you don't put any P's on your SS all your eligible players will be exposed

I know that. But I thought we might have lists here too, for those that wanted to put them here. It could be unofficial.

Matthew wroteCOLONI know that. But I thought we might have lists here too, for those that wanted to put them here. It could be unofficial.

If it's unofficial it wouldn't mean anything tho right? No P on SS you'd still be exposing them. Seems like it would potentially create a point of contention if someone forgets to do their SS

Incoming qq from some lazy bastids

Who's best to PM for personal clarification on something, I'm not finding answers to my questions from capfriendly

anyone of us, we all if unsure, put the question to the group too

The BBKL Insider wroteCOLON

Matthew wroteCOLONI suppose if Steve really wanted to do it he could just trade tim the player he isn't allowed to expose and in exchange tim can't choose any of his players available with any value.

essentially this...if Tim liked Vesey the most i could always trade him to Tim for Eakin/Savard after expansion. I was simply trying to give him another option to sway him for taking one of those 2...in the end it doesn't really matter.

Functionally i do not think you can expose Vesey, but you can make the arrangement to do the swap in understanding. That would be legal/how it'll be done in NHL too

thom54 wroteCOLONanyone of us, we all if unsure, put the question to the group too

Very well.

According to capfriendly I don't have any Defensemen that meet NHL exposure requirements, but I think this is due to them being upcoming UFAs.(??I think) I DO have 2 that meet 40/70 though, that's sufficient enough for exposure in bbkl? I feel like it's been answered but I'm nervous I might need to find a Dman to expose.