Re: VAN/NJD HELP.
PostedCOLON Sun May 15, 2011 12:13 am
Mem cup will go to Missisauga
The Ultimate Fantasy Hockey Experience
http://nhlnotes.com/bbkl/
me too, but in a way it's pay back for all the steal that NJ got from new Gm.bergey wroteCOLONveto, im in! ... i LOVE nash.
SuperMario wroteCOLON this deal should logically be vetoed, but the fact that gms want to see scotts team get worse which is a rather sad statement about competitive spirit.
bergey wroteCOLONGet on it.
you've been listening to way too much of scotts "the world is out to get me" mumbo jumbo. Any established GM has been able to make massive overpayments without the word veto thrown around, its when its a new GM or a less established GM makes a deal with Scott that is clearly one sided that people speak up. It just happens so frequently that it seems like everyone is out to get scott. Just look at Kareems past and how many overpayments he has made for players he wanted IE John Carlson deal with myself. This isnt the league being uncompetitive in any way lol.SuperMario wroteCOLONlol no conspiracy. good on scott. but this does bring up the fact that gms who constantly hate on scotts deals aggresively asking for vetoes are being very passive about this deal. this deal should logically be vetoed. but the fact that gms want to see scotts team get worse which is a rather sad statement about competitive spirit. i say build the best team you got scott and don't overpay like this. i'll keep goin till i win .
We have a winner.shooker wroteCOLONyou've been listening to way too much of scotts "the world is out to get me" mumbo jumbo. Any established GM has been able to make massive overpayments without the word veto thrown around, its when its a new GM or a less established GM makes a deal with Scott that is clearly one sided that people speak up. It just happens so frequently that it seems like everyone is out to get scott. Just look at Kareems past and how many overpayments he has made for players he wanted IE John Carlson deal with myself. This isnt the league being uncompetitive in any way lol.SuperMario wroteCOLONlol no conspiracy. good on scott. but this does bring up the fact that gms who constantly hate on scotts deals aggresively asking for vetoes are being very passive about this deal. this deal should logically be vetoed. but the fact that gms want to see scotts team get worse which is a rather sad statement about competitive spirit. i say build the best team you got scott and don't overpay like this. i'll keep goin till i win .
Maybe, maybe not. But what's really funny about this is that you say it as if I'm the only GM who has taken advantage of someone. I can think of plenty of deals that have been someone taking advantage of a new/retarded GM. This is why we have the 2 week trade freeze when a new GM enters and have had for quite sometime now.shooker wroteCOLONyou've been listening to way too much of scotts "the world is out to get me" mumbo jumbo. Any established GM has been able to make massive overpayments without the word veto thrown around, its when its a new GM or a less established GM makes a deal with Scott that is clearly one sided that people speak up. It just happens so frequently that it seems like everyone is out to get scott. Just look at Kareems past and how many overpayments he has made for players he wanted IE John Carlson deal with myself. This isnt the league being uncompetitive in any way lol.SuperMario wroteCOLONlol no conspiracy. good on scott. but this does bring up the fact that gms who constantly hate on scotts deals aggresively asking for vetoes are being very passive about this deal. this deal should logically be vetoed. but the fact that gms want to see scotts team get worse which is a rather sad statement about competitive spirit. i say build the best team you got scott and don't overpay like this. i'll keep goin till i win .
I'd say people hate you more for comments like that.The Devil wroteCOLONBut, this is why I decided to back off this year and let someone else win.
That's good.. I'd rather be hated for a reason. That is why I said that.. to piss people off. Too bad it's 100% true too..Snipeshow wroteCOLONI'd say people hate you more for comments like that.The Devil wroteCOLONBut, this is why I decided to back off this year and let someone else win.
The Devil wroteCOLONMaybe, maybe not. But what's really funny about this is that you say it as if I'm the only GM who has taken advantage of someone. I can think of plenty of deals that have been someone taking advantage of a new/retarded GM. This is why we have the 2 week trade freeze when a new GM enters and have had for quite sometime now.shooker wroteCOLONyou've been listening to way too much of scotts "the world is out to get me" mumbo jumbo. Any established GM has been able to make massive overpayments without the word veto thrown around, its when its a new GM or a less established GM makes a deal with Scott that is clearly one sided that people speak up. It just happens so frequently that it seems like everyone is out to get scott. Just look at Kareems past and how many overpayments he has made for players he wanted IE John Carlson deal with myself. This isnt the league being uncompetitive in any way lol.SuperMario wroteCOLONlol no conspiracy. good on scott. but this does bring up the fact that gms who constantly hate on scotts deals aggresively asking for vetoes are being very passive about this deal. this deal should logically be vetoed. but the fact that gms want to see scotts team get worse which is a rather sad statement about competitive spirit. i say build the best team you got scott and don't overpay like this. i'll keep goin till i win .
As for the "the world world is out to get me" statement.. I'm not into conspiracies but there's absolutely ZERO doubt that the majority in this league is jealous of the trades I make and the accomplishments I've achieved. I'm almost hating because of it, which is absolutely fine. But, this is why I decided to back off this year and let someone else win.