The Ultimate Fantasy Hockey Experience
http://nhlnotes.com/bbkl/
pretty funny that comes out right after the trade. Regardless of where he goes I think I made the right move.facey wroteCOLONDallas has said they won't be offering Richards a contract... time to get excited
Scott you shouldn't be laughing after your Knights fiasco. You're worse than I am. But in this Richards case, you will see how that guy stays my #1 Center if he is the Leafs #1 Center.The Devil wroteCOLONhahahahaSuperMario wroteCOLONIf Richards becomes a Maple Leaf, I will officially have my FIRST untradeable asset.MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONI'm surprised no one else has mentioned the obvious plus on Shiv's side of the deal, he added a future Maple Leaf
omg omg omgfacey wroteCOLONDallas has said they won't be offering Richards a contract... time to get excited
Not really, this has been known for more than a month now. In fact I specifically recall having this exact conversation with you, and remarking (definitively) that Dallas ownership had given up on the pursuit of Richards.facey wroteCOLONDallas has said they won't be offering Richards a contract... time to get excited
I don't get it.. what fiasco? I'm worse then you at exactly what? Saying someone's untouchable and then trading them?SuperMario wroteCOLONScott you shouldn't be laughing after your Knights fiasco. You're worse than I am. But in this Richards case, you will see how that guy stays my #1 Center if he is the Leafs #1 Center.The Devil wroteCOLONhahahahaSuperMario wroteCOLONIf Richards becomes a Maple Leaf, I will officially have my FIRST untradeable asset.MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONI'm surprised no one else has mentioned the obvious plus on Shiv's side of the deal, he added a future Maple Leaf
How so?The Devil wroteCOLONThat's a negative imoMSP4LYFE wroteCOLONI'm surprised no one else has mentioned the obvious plus on Shiv's side of the deal, he added a future Maple Leaf
Because Richards will become Shiv's FIRST untradeable asset of course..MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONHow so?The Devil wroteCOLONThat's a negative imoMSP4LYFE wroteCOLONI'm surprised no one else has mentioned the obvious plus on Shiv's side of the deal, he added a future Maple Leaf
The Devil wroteCOLONBecause Richards will become Shiv's FIRST untradeable asset of course..MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONHow so?The Devil wroteCOLONThat's a negative imoMSP4LYFE wroteCOLONI'm surprised no one else has mentioned the obvious plus on Shiv's side of the deal, he added a future Maple Leaf
.You still didn't answer my questionSuperMario wroteCOLONThe Devil wroteCOLONBecause Richards will become Shiv's FIRST untradeable asset of course..MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONHow so?The Devil wroteCOLONThat's a negative imoMSP4LYFE wroteCOLONI'm surprised no one else has mentioned the obvious plus on Shiv's side of the deal, he added a future Maple Leaf
I don't get it.. what fiasco? I'm worse then you at exactly what? Saying someone's untouchable and then trading them?
No, I 100% don't.. please give me these answers I should know..SuperMario wroteCOLONOh I just ignored your post because you know the answers to those questions already.
sounds similar to that whole hockeydb thing shiv. I know your frustration in having to explain the obviousThe Devil wroteCOLONNo, I 100% don't.. please give me these answers I should know..SuperMario wroteCOLONOh I just ignored your post because you know the answers to those questions already.
The hockeydb thing was weak and retarded.. I don't understand stupidity lol.shooker wroteCOLONsounds similar to that whole hockeydb thing shiv. I know your frustration in having to explain the obviousThe Devil wroteCOLONNo, I 100% don't.. please give me these answers I should know..SuperMario wroteCOLONOh I just ignored your post because you know the answers to those questions already.
Would you like an example or definition?The Devil wroteCOLONI don't understand stupidity lol.
haha, good oneMSP4LYFE wroteCOLONWould you like an example or definition?The Devil wroteCOLONI don't understand stupidity lol.