Page 2 of 5
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:45 am
by Scott
Luke's a salary pimp
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Wed Oct 05, 2011 1:02 am
by Monk
Nick wroteCOLONLuke Walker (0.563) ** needs to be CBS updated **
awesome work as always Luke, greatly appreciated.
done, welcome
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Wed Oct 05, 2011 8:31 am
by Shep
Luke you're awesome.
I'm going to double check everything tonight when I get home, for my team.
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Wed Oct 05, 2011 10:28 am
by Monk
strome and saad cap hits added
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Wed Oct 05, 2011 10:33 pm
by Shoalzie
Pandolfo 1.400
I still need Curtis McKenzie added to my team (see placeholder thread)
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:34 pm
by MSP4LYFE
Can someone please transfer John Scott from Dallas to my team, I claimed him on waivers, but thus far have been unable to have him transferred.
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:45 pm
by Nick
http://www.capgeek.com/players/display.php?id=2128
RILEY BOYCHUK signs in buffalo -> CAP HIT: $569,167
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:15 pm
by Monk
nice good catch, thx nick
others:
florida - ryan martindale signed to an ELC (0.690 / 3 years) ... jamie oleksiak ELC (1.400 / 3 years)
new jersey - scott valentine signed to an ELC (0.565 / 3 years) with nashville, previously reported as signing an AHL deal which appears to be outdated
pittsburgh - jonathan huberdeau signed to an ELC ( 3.175 / 3 years)
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:54 am
by bills09
JF Berube 540,000
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Wed Oct 12, 2011 10:05 pm
by Monk
bills09 wroteCOLONJF Berube 540,000
done thx
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:15 pm
by Monk
added a couple new prospect signings:
tampa bay - petr mrazek signed 3 year ELC @ 0.605 / year
dallas - viktor rask signed 3 year ELC @ 0.743 / year
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 01, 2011 4:15 am
by kyuss
MadarameIkakku83 wroteCOLON
nashville: reid boucher, gregory hofmann, jarod palmer, andre petersson, mattias ekholm
thx dude!
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Fri Nov 04, 2011 5:19 pm
by Chris
A problem. Since when does Veilleux have a contract with the St. Louis Blues? I've looked everywhere, but I can't find anything to substantiate that he signed a contract at any point between when I traded for him in late September and today.
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Mon Nov 07, 2011 9:50 am
by Chuck Norris
Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLONA problem. Since when does Veilleux have a contract with the St. Louis Blues? I've looked everywhere, but I can't find anything to substantiate that he signed a contract at any point between when I traded for him in late September and today.
Not sure why he has a contract on cbs as capgeek and other sites do not have him listed as signed. Ive removed his contract status on cbs for you.
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Mon Nov 07, 2011 9:53 am
by Lee
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:06 am
by Chris
Not the same player, Lee. First name: Yannick. 2011 4th Round Draft pick by the Blues.
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:09 am
by Lee
Probably where the confusion lays, then. Please use the full player name when posting.
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:14 am
by Chris
Well, not to be a prick, but I did say "... of the St. Louis Blues"...
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:16 am
by Lee
One would automatically assume that you meant a player that atleast a majority of people may have heard of through passing, not a 4th round prospect from recent years.
That's why full names are important.
Re: Salary changes needed in CBS
PostedCOLON Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:19 am
by Chris
Fair enough Lee. I usually have a habit of posting entire names. I'll keep doing that in the future to avoid confusions.