Buds Board Keepers League

yep, has 2 hits already as well

Nick wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONIf Nick loses in the first round this year (again) he should be a shoe in for the 'all talk no walk' award, or the 'just not very good award'.

Gotta talk to win it I think... simply having a reasonably good team that doesn't perform sufficiently is a different story.

Reasonably good eh? You probably don't have a very good shot next week then, my team is dominant, and I think you would agree that dominant > reasonably good more often than not.

WTF is with Bogo... Wrist/Foot/Groin/lower/upper/day/week/re-agrovated/new... talk about poor reporting!!

robbed of an assist by Karlsson as well as Marchand and Connolly's fight that was downgraded to roughing penalties

Well.. Mike and I are lacking in interest for the league/playoffs here... no animosity, no bitch fest, so here comes a little of both:

- No Bogo all week
- Unexpected absence from Ott last night
- Giroux & Kopitar both played wing to start the week, injury and new trade respectively
- Jagr left a game early - but returned the next
- Still no Howard
- Voracek got KRONWALLED
- Green got suspended

Details:

Going into today we've both played a total of 33gp. Both scored 8 goals. Mike is getting embarrassed in +/-, but everything is still in play. Two of the strongest goaltending team all season, have very disappointing goalie # on the week - who gets a good game first?

I like Mike, but want his playoff run to end here. Hopefully he won't quit as a result.

i want this to be a tie because i think you are both very friendly people

Thanks for cheering for me Anton

Even if you don't know that you did.


Meant to note: our goalies are playing each other right now. MacDonald vs Quick, one thing is not like the other

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Nick wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONIf Nick loses in the first round this year (again) he should be a shoe in for the 'all talk no walk' award, or the 'just not very good award'.

Gotta talk to win it I think... simply having a reasonably good team that doesn't perform sufficiently is a different story.

Reasonably good eh? You probably don't have a very good shot next week then, my team is dominant, and I think you would agree that dominant > reasonably good more often than not.

Your team? You threw a bitch fit and left. You don't have a team.

Go simulation!

Kezia wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Nick wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONIf Nick loses in the first round this year (again) he should be a shoe in for the 'all talk no walk' award, or the 'just not very good award'.

Gotta talk to win it I think... simply having a reasonably good team that doesn't perform sufficiently is a different story.

Reasonably good eh? You probably don't have a very good shot next week then, my team is dominant, and I think you would agree that dominant > reasonably good more often than not.

Your team? You threw a bitch fit and left. You don't have a team.

Go simulation!

He said that before he quit.

Pfft. Time stamps.

I love it when people talk shit after the fact, where was your response when I said it?

Kezia wroteCOLONYour team? You threw a bitch fit and left. You don't have a team.

Go simulation!

Show me this bitch fit? The only fits I saw was from the people who had an issue with my decision.

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONI love it when people talk shit after the fact, where was your response when I said it?

I'm not in the playoffs and IDDGAF how the simulated owner team is doing.

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Kezia wroteCOLONYour team? You threw a bitch fit and left. You don't have a team.

Go simulation!

Show me this bitch fit? The only fits I saw was from the people who had an issue with my decision.

You quit because a player became injured in a game.

Kezia wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Kezia wroteCOLONYour team? You threw a bitch fit and left. You don't have a team.

Go simulation!

Show me this bitch fit? The only fits I saw was from the people who had an issue with my decision.

You quit because a player became injured in a game.

Give him more credit than that..multiple players on his team got injured in a game.

Kezia wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Kezia wroteCOLONYour team? You threw a bitch fit and left. You don't have a team.

Go simulation!

Show me this bitch fit? The only fits I saw was from the people who had an issue with my decision.

You quit because a player became injured in a game.

Ugh, I think I might leave the community after all, this is getting boring quick.

Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Kezia wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Kezia wroteCOLONYour team? You threw a bitch fit and left. You don't have a team.

Go simulation!

Show me this bitch fit? The only fits I saw was from the people who had an issue with my decision.

You quit because a player became injured in a game.

Ugh, I think I might leave the community after all, this is getting boring quick.

you really think you could just quit because a few of your guys got hurt and you might lose a week and then carry on posting and not get shit for it?

ROFL. you're going to be a running joke of BBKL whether you stay or not bro.

Lots of GP for both teams tomorrow...

Most important w/o a doubt is CHI vs LAK, a strong Quick showing could result in some major swings: GAA, SV%, W & SO. But as lope-sided as the scoreboard looks (13-1-2), so many categories can still change.

differences->
A: 4
BS: 5
G: 1
GAA: 1.00
Hits: 13
PIM: 2
PTS: 5
SO: 0
SV%: 0.061
STPTS: 3
W: 0

Nick wroteCOLONLots of GP for both teams tomorrow...

Most important w/o a doubt is CHI vs LAK, a strong Quick showing could result in some major swings: GAA, SV%, W & SO. But as lope-sided as the scoreboard looks (13-1-2), so many categories can still change.

differences->
A: 4
BS: 5
G: 1
GAA: 1.00
Hits: 13
PIM: 2
PTS: 5
SO: 0
SV%: 0.061
STPTS: 3
W: 0

It is possible, but I feel I need Quick to pull out a miraculous 10-SHTOI shutout (perhaps a fight and a special teams assist as well?) to get it done.