Buds Board Keepers League

PostedCOLON **Wed May 10, 2017 8:04 am**

Contracts do not matter in here I think, if you own a player they are always yours. As long as they meet 40/70 requirement you should be good. At least that's my understanding.

PostedCOLON **Wed May 10, 2017 8:25 am**

Shoalzie wroteCOLON
koomzzz wroteCOLONare our rules for this somewhat finalized? do contracts matter for our exposure requirements or just games played in the previous season or 2?

We're honoring the 40/70 exposure rule and we're using the exempt list from CapFriendly. The only things we're not acknowledging is NMC or long term injuries.

Any player that isn't under contract this season (rookie or veteran) is exempt from the draft.

In short, the only players eligible for the draft are any players under contract (for this season) that don't fall under the 1st/2nd year pro rule. (See CapFriendly for the exempt list).

PostedCOLON **Wed May 10, 2017 8:28 am**

dave1959 wroteCOLON
Shoalzie wroteCOLON
koomzzz wroteCOLONare our rules for this somewhat finalized? do contracts matter for our exposure requirements or just games played in the previous season or 2?

We're honoring the 40/70 exposure rule and we're using the exempt list from CapFriendly. The only things we're not acknowledging is NMC or long term injuries.

Any player that isn't under contract this season (rookie or veteran) is exempt from the draft.

In short, the only players eligible for the draft are any players under contract (for this season) that don't fall under the 1st/2nd year pro rule. (See CapFriendly for the exempt list).

It was posted some time ago that a UFA would count as long as it's believed that will get another contract so basically eliminating old guys.

This has changed?

PostedCOLON **Wed May 10, 2017 8:30 am**

He means a contract last season. So the player can be ufa or rfa right now.

PostedCOLON **Wed May 10, 2017 8:36 am**

Thank you

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 12:34 pm**

are there any players that need to be protected while still being waiver exempts or do the two things exclude each other because of their requirements?

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 12:37 pm**

I really don't know how Scott could have made it any easier for us.

He created an Expansion Tab on our spreadsheet that CLEARLY show EVERY player that is exposed to the Draft.

All we have to do is put a P beside the ones we want protected.

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 12:39 pm**

is that supposed to be a comment to my question? because I don't see how the two things are related

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 12:47 pm**

Everyone that needs to be protected is on that list mik. Some players remain waiver exempt but require expansion protection.

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 12:55 pm**

kyuss wroteCOLONare there any players that need to be protected while still being waiver exempts or do the two things exclude each other because of their requirements?

Yeah, definitely, given our Bbkl waiver exempt requirements have nothing to do with how long a player spends in the AHL. AHL players that have never played an NHL game can be expansion eligible but still have years of waiver exemption in bbkl. For example, just one player on my team would be Justin Auger.

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 12:55 pm**

kyuss wroteCOLONare there any players that need to be protected while still being waiver exempts or do the two things exclude each other because of their requirements?

Have nothing to do with each other. Expansion eligible is based on accumulated seasons per NHL guidelines, waiver exempt is NHL GP and age.

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 12:58 pm**

foofnik wroteCOLON
kyuss wroteCOLONare there any players that need to be protected while still being waiver exempts or do the two things exclude each other because of their requirements?
Have nothing to do with each other. Expansion eligible is based on accumulated seasons per NHL guidelines, waiver exempt is NHL GP and age.

In bbkl. In the NHL things can get complicated.

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 12:59 pm**

Is this kyuss fuckin serious?... 3 days before expansion lock and asking this type of novice as fuck type question?... jesus im like the worst GM here and even i clearly know the difference. Where the fuck have u been lol in fact where the fuck are some of these guys like monk and shit they rly gonna prepare to have their entire roster exposed due to not meeting the requirement lol. Holy shit

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 1:02 pm**

I don't know if Monk has done his sheet but Nick's is done.

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 1:04 pm**

Wtf lol

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 1:17 pm**

Are stolarz and mrazek both expansion eligible?

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 1:46 pm**

Matthew wroteCOLONAre stolarz and mrazek both expansion eligible?

Yes

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 1:53 pm**

PM me what u wud want for either
I will pay fairly

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 1:57 pm**

kimmer wroteCOLONIs this kyuss fuckin serious?... 3 days before expansion lock and asking this type of novice as fuck type question?...

sorry bro, have not been sleeping enough these days and I thought it would be quicker to ask then getting my brain thinking about it while working

PostedCOLON **Fri May 12, 2017 2:00 pm**

kimmer wroteCOLONPM me what u wud want for either
I will pay fairly

Based on your deleted PM, I don't agree with that statement

Buds Board Keepers League

expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft

Re: expansion draft