Buds Board Keepers League

CasperX22 wroteCOLON

Bruyns wroteCOLONWent with Wilson over Ben and Luck and that seems decent now.

Hard to go wrong. Had them ranked 1-2-3 at the start of the week.

Ben? No he's going to have an awful week.

Bruyns wroteCOLONWent with Wilson over Ben and Luck and that seems decent now.

Was a really easy play going in to the week IMO. Ben would've garnered ZERO consideration. Rams D has been shit recently, and with how Wilson is getting some rushing yards, I'd have considered it an absolute no-brainer to go Wilson.

CAM wroteCOLONI am hoping for a miracle....my team on left

This is what i got left Shep. Opponent even had the TD stealing Baldwin. grr...

Shep wroteCOLON

CasperX22 wroteCOLON

Bruyns wroteCOLONWent with Wilson over Ben and Luck and that seems decent now.

Hard to go wrong. Had them ranked 1-2-3 at the start of the week.

Ben? No he's going to have an awful week.

Based on? Fwiw I recommended Wilson.

Wilson was coming off a terrible game and I was worried they would get up a couple TDs and run a lot. Still seemed like the best matchup and was easier then deciding between one of Kelly/Powell/Booker/Farrow. I'm not playing Booker so it's really 3 choices and I'm leaning Powell.

Need some advice fellas!!!!

I am behind the 8 ball in a match against number 1 seed. Looking for hail mary.

Do i start Ty Montgomery who has WR eligibility as RB with Starks out against CHI over Julian Edelman at Denver?

Then do i start Lamar Miller vs JAX or Latavius Murray @ SD?????????????

These moves define my season. Usually i would Start my Studs but......my studs have been duds....

Edelman will get the ball but no guarantee of getting in the end zone. He's still a good WR in a PPR. Montgomery is a decent play but I'd trust Edelman to get a certain number of targets. Montgomery is going to share carries and touches with Michael.

Miller has the better matchup but Murray has scored TDs each of the last 3 weeks. I'd lean Miller. I tend to favor matchups over trends.

CAM wroteCOLONNeed some advice fellas!!!!

I am behind the 8 ball in a match against number 1 seed. Looking for hail mary.

Do i start Ty Montgomery who has WR eligibility as RB with Starks out against CHI over Julian Edelman at Denver?

Then do i start Lamar Miller vs JAX or Latavius Murray @ SD?????????????

These moves define my season. Usually i would Start my Studs but......my studs have been duds....

Don't you have Nelson and Sanders? Both have better matchups imo than Edelman in the 1st place. And why would Montgomery even be a consideration with Nelson and Adams to contend with for targets? He's not enough a part of the running game to be much of a factor there either. Miller and Murray matchups are a wash. Keleche Osmele is listed as questionable for the Raiders though. His health could play a major role in Murray's performance today.

I have Nelson and Sanders.

These are the likely lineups for today...

My team:
QB Luck
WR J. Nelson, E. Sanders, S. Watkins*
RB J. Hill, D. Martin
TE T. Eifert
K C. Santos
DEF Dallas

My opponent:
QB Stafford
WR M. Evans, M. Crabtree, A. Jeffrey
RB T. Montgomery, D. Booker
TE D. Walker
K J. Tucker
DEF Cincinnati

*If Watkins can't go, I've got Diggs on my bench. Julio is inactive.

My Team:
QB B. Roethlisberger
RB D. Johnson
RB J. Howard
WR J. Nelson
WR S.Watkins/S. Diggs(pending Watkins status(
TE G. Olsen
Flex S. Ware
K C. Sturgis
DEF Miami(dropped Minnesota for them this week. Seems like a good play considering Miami gave me 21 pts)

Opponent:
QB A. Luck
RB L. Murray
RB L. Miller
WR M. Crabtree
WR T Montgomery
TE T. Eifert
Flex T. West
K C. Santos
DEF KC

Lots of similar names involved.

I have Nelson active and Sanders benched against NE. Trying to balance Montgomery with WR eligibility in Yahoo against Edelmans 10 pts he usually gets and against a tough Denver D.

CasperX22 wroteCOLONMy Team:
QB B. Roethlisberger
RB D. Johnson
RB J. Howard
WR J. Nelson
WR S.Watkins/S. Diggs(pending Watkins status(
TE G. Olsen
Flex S. Ware
K C. Sturgis
DEF Miami(dropped Minnesota for them this week. Seems like a good play considering Miami gave me 21 pts)

Opponent:
QB A. Luck
RB L. Murray
RB L. Miller
WR M. Crabtree
WR T Montgomery
TE T. Eifert
Flex T. West
K C. Santos
DEF KC

For you an me both, what are the odds Ben bucks his trends on the road against Cinci at that? Fuck i need him to go off....Please...

Shoalzie wroteCOLONEdelman will get the ball but no guarantee of getting in the end zone. He's still a good WR in a PPR. Montgomery is a decent play but I'd trust Edelman to get a certain number of targets. Montgomery is going to share carries and touches with Michael.

Miller has the better matchup but Murray has scored TDs each of the last 3 weeks. I'd lean Miller. I tend to favor matchups over trends.

I thought Michael was a stretch to play because he has the flu? That is one of my concerns/interests as well...

Its going to be super cold and thinking the running game will be a good part for a change and especially if Rodgers gets pulled from his leg...

If only I could play my bench too lol!

QB: M. Mariotta
RB: R. Kelley
RB: K. Dixon
RB: T. Hightower
WR. S. Diggs
WR: A. Jeffery
WR: A. Robinson

CAM wroteCOLON

CasperX22 wroteCOLONMy Team:
QB B. Roethlisberger
RB D. Johnson
RB J. Howard
WR J. Nelson
WR S.Watkins/S. Diggs(pending Watkins status(
TE G. Olsen
Flex S. Ware
K C. Sturgis
DEF Miami(dropped Minnesota for them this week. Seems like a good play considering Miami gave me 21 pts)

Opponent:
QB A. Luck
RB L. Murray
RB L. Miller
WR M. Crabtree
WR T Montgomery
TE T. Eifert
Flex T. West
K C. Santos
DEF KC

For you an me both, what are the odds Ben bucks his trends on the road against Cinci at that? Fuck i need him to go off....Please...

Ben has a good history against Cincinnati and I trust him in the middle of a playoff push. Certainly more so than Mariotta against an Andy Reid coached team in December. For me anyways. Hard to get against Andy in November and December.

And Sanders has the better matchup than Edelman. And Montgomery for that matter. NE is stout against the run, but really bad against the pass. Logically you would think Denver would throw a lot in this game, but Kubiak has been known to force feed the run against all hope. Still, playing the best matchups tend to give you the highest odds of success.

CAM wroteCOLON

Shoalzie wroteCOLONEdelman will get the ball but no guarantee of getting in the end zone. He's still a good WR in a PPR. Montgomery is a decent play but I'd trust Edelman to get a certain number of targets. Montgomery is going to share carries and touches with Michael.

Miller has the better matchup but Murray has scored TDs each of the last 3 weeks. I'd lean Miller. I tend to favor matchups over trends.

I thought Michael was a stretch to play because he has the flu? That is one of my concerns/interests as well...

Its going to be super cold and thinking the running game will be a good part for a change and especially if Rodgers gets pulled from his leg...

I'd think the Pack will try to run today with the awful weather. Won't be snowing or windy...just very cold.

I was fairly impressed the Bears' defense last week against the Lions but granted, they've got no running game. Riddick didn't even play.

Shoalzie wroteCOLON

CAM wroteCOLON

Shoalzie wroteCOLONEdelman will get the ball but no guarantee of getting in the end zone. He's still a good WR in a PPR. Montgomery is a decent play but I'd trust Edelman to get a certain number of targets. Montgomery is going to share carries and touches with Michael.

Miller has the better matchup but Murray has scored TDs each of the last 3 weeks. I'd lean Miller. I tend to favor matchups over trends.

I thought Michael was a stretch to play because he has the flu? That is one of my concerns/interests as well...

Its going to be super cold and thinking the running game will be a good part for a change and especially if Rodgers gets pulled from his leg...

I'd think the Pack will try to run today with the awful weather. Won't be snowing or windy...just very cold.

I was fairly impressed the Bears' defense last week against the Lions but granted, they've got no running game. Riddick didn't even play.

Chicago's defense is actually not bad. Fairly mediocre across the board. In terms of dvoa 18th overall 14th against the pass and 20th against the run.