Buds Board Keepers League

Lee wroteCOLONYou got me, Paul. I'm a terrible GM.

Lee wroteCOLONYou got me, Paul. I'm a terrible GM.

kimmer wroteCOLON

Lee wroteCOLONYou got me, Paul. I'm a terrible GM.

nah bro please dont say silly shit like that to patronize urself. You and I tbh are both sub-par level GM when it comes to competing lvl. I'm a modest and humble guy. this is far from me boasting about my own ability i have vs urs

all i wanted was for u to explain to me what u consider "value" because man, I blew up cuz thats all u go on and on about. I get that while I mostly sound like a nerd raging teenager, i dont see why it's not a valid concern. I seriously dont give a shit about the going young and get picks - type build man you guys constantly misunderstand the core of my argument. It is about GP and thats it.

If your method of direction ur taking ur team to, becomes a hindrance in meeting basic league requirement or ur struggling to meet it on a yearly basis, your method is a fuckin problem. Instead of making it work Lee, I see u more often than not "bitching" about the way CC runs/implement the rules and constantly tries to suggest we make changes. Dont use the contender vulture excuse because we r an open market in a 30 team league. Basically in other words I just stressed a little to eat up a little "value" that u can if it means abiding by the rules without a problem.

I had a question on "value" that Lee goes on about every time particularly and only because of that. Because you never feel your players are losing "value" and apparently other players on other teams are, your always struggling with GP claiming u refuse to "overpay" for these pieces. I joked a bit with arian not to be a crybaby few days ago but thers a bit of truth to it and he understood. Why does a perrenial bottom team like mine never fails to make GP? I (believe) i make reasonable deals to complement my overall direction (b lvl prospect>>> collect>> upgrade to actual impactful but slightly washed up or on the older end of scale nhlers). Next step for me is probably to start collecting picks because im happy with my active nhl roster composition.

KapG wroteCOLONGrossman is even less mobile than schenn and MacDonald's just been fucking atrocious. You put schenn with someone who can move the puck and he's OK out there.

I remember when be was paired with kimmo a couple seasons back and they were pretty solid together.

Oh well.

kimmer wroteCOLON

KapG wroteCOLONGrossman is even less mobile than schenn and MacDonald's just been fucking atrocious. You put schenn with someone who can move the puck and he's OK out there.

I remember when be was paired with kimmo a couple seasons back and they were pretty solid together.

Oh well.

exactly

i guess we know a bit more about schenn cuz we knew him as a leaf. WYSWYG with him we dont label him elite or great by any means, but we know where he belongs/what hes capable of

also on that note we learned about MacDonald and how bad he is lol

CasperX22 wroteCOLONEveryone is solid that is paired with Timmo. Grossmann was too as was MacDonald for a time. Doesn't make him any better than the other 2.

KapG wroteCOLON

CasperX22 wroteCOLONEveryone is solid that is paired with Timmo. Grossmann was too as was MacDonald for a time. Doesn't make him any better than the other 2.

We will just agree to disagree.

Lee wroteCOLONIf interested, apply within or via PM

Andrej Meszaros / Jack Hillen + Stefan Matteau + PIT 2nd for a young NHL DMAN.

The BBKL Insider wroteCOLONGrossman sucks at hockey and should be in the AHL if not ECHL

CasperX22 wroteCOLON

The BBKL Insider wroteCOLONGrossman sucks at hockey and should be in the AHL if not ECHL

MacDonald and Schenn can join him personally.

Lee wroteCOLON

Lee wroteCOLONIf interested, apply within or via PM

Andrej Meszaros / Jack Hillen + Stefan Matteau + PIT 2nd for a young NHL DMAN.

Updated