Buds Board Keepers League

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

shooker wroteCOLONLOL this comment. You clearly just said if you can show its flawed we will change it yet you still get shit on. You are the clear head in this conversation and making valid points and allowing discussion to follow with only "how the fuck", "why the fuck" and "this is a fucking joke" as the counters. It's times like these are when I really feel my time in the bbkl is nearing its end. Im soo sick of all this crap.

This comment is equally nonconstructive, profanity is a part of our vernacular, it's not really a big issue in my mind.

I'm getting used to Shooker bitching all the time lol.

SuperMario wroteCOLON

shooker wroteCOLON It's times like these are when I really feel my time in the bbkl is nearing its end. Im soo sick of all this crap.

I've seen you make multiple posts like this on the forum. If you want to leave, you are free to. It'd be a shame and I'm sure I can speak for everyone when I say that we would all want you to stay. Stop bitching about it though. It's almost Scott-like lol.

done lol

There should 100% be an appeal process......
brign your case to a CC member and the CC and Admins will vote on the change.

The system works but with its flaws there must be an appeal process.
Without it, its plain retarded.

Oh BBKL's on its rag again

bills09 wroteCOLONThere should 100% be an appeal process......
brign your case to a CC member and the CC and Admins will vote on the change.

The system works but with its flaws there must be an appeal process.
Without it, its plain retarded.

this is all i've asked for lol. well said billy.

shooker wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLON

shooker wroteCOLON It's times like these are when I really feel my time in the bbkl is nearing its end. Im soo sick of all this crap.

I've seen you make multiple posts like this on the forum. If you want to leave, you are free to. It'd be a shame and I'm sure I can speak for everyone when I say that we would all want you to stay. Stop bitching about it though. It's almost Scott-like lol.

done lol

you da man.

SuperMario wroteCOLON

shooker wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLON

shooker wroteCOLON It's times like these are when I really feel my time in the bbkl is nearing its end. Im soo sick of all this crap.

I've seen you make multiple posts like this on the forum. If you want to leave, you are free to. It'd be a shame and I'm sure I can speak for everyone when I say that we would all want you to stay. Stop bitching about it though. It's almost Scott-like lol.

done lol

you da man.

Im not talking about my bitching lol. I am saying I am sick of all this lame drama where everyone is only interested if it negativly affects them. So instead of my bitching im just done.

BTW.

Nick made a good point abuot Jokinen. I think in his case specifically, if you don't qualify under B) and C) .. A should be nullified.

appeal process needs to make sense... not a claim that he's a WINGER!!!! LOUD NOISES!!!!!!F-bombs and well saids...


subjectivity doesn't work with so much vested interest, alliances and stuff that tends to happen here.

SuperMario wroteCOLON

bills09 wroteCOLONThere should 100% be an appeal process......
brign your case to a CC member and the CC and Admins will vote on the change.

The system works but with its flaws there must be an appeal process.
Without it, its plain retarded.

this is all i've asked for lol. well said billy.

yeah right, putting together a system like this just to make it completely useless.. that's plain retarded.


free add:
maybe there was a reason bergey couldn't log in lol

facey wroteCOLON However if it results on 5.3 centres per team, I'd have too agree that's too much and some of the criteria needs to be shuffled to get it closer to 5C per team (150 net)

i'm still wondering why 5.3 would be too much. Can someone explain that to me?

also, i'm gonna report here what i wrote in the CC previously today:

kyuss wroteCOLON there seems to be some confusion over this overall number thing.

We will have many more players listed as centers than the available spots. The same happens with the other positions and there is nothing wrong with that.
What we need to care about is the total number of regular NHLers listed as centers.

Having that number not too high, say not higher than 160 (just a quick guess), could be a valid argument.

i already said i agree with you.

Can we just start the entry draft already?

how would an appeal process make this useless.......:S

bills09 wroteCOLONhow would an appeal process make this useless.......:S

adding exceptions/appeals based on anything subjective would make it useless.

The reasons are obvious and Nick already posted about that.

Because unless clearly outlined the appeal process will be abused and this whole thing to waste.

Why didn't you voice any of these concerns while the CC was discussing and asking for opinions? I know you noted that Marleau and Joki were iffy on the top 4 list, however the other criteria we've worked to come up with supports Marleau as a C and Joki as a W

-> so moving foward is it a good idea that an amendment to the positional listing can be made if the player in question meets a) Top 4 FOT however has b) FOT < 450 & c) FOR <.3 ?