Buds Board Keepers League

has anyone not protected players yet?

The BBKL Insider wroteCOLONhas anyone not protected players yet?

I think NYR is the only one not entered in the spreadsheet yet

Just me


I know who I want to protect, just working on the google documents part

Bruyns wroteCOLONAlso his sheet still isn't showing Kovy needs protection so if you read this Shoalzie or Kyle you should update that.

Why is Kovalchuk eligible? I thought we talked about only using players that were under contract last season.

Kovy doesn't need protection, he's a retired player....same would apply to someone like Chris Pronger.

What about Dadonov and Voynov?

Loki wroteCOLONWhat about Dadonov and Voynov?

I would assume the same applies to them. I would check capfriendly to make sure though.

The BBKL Insider wroteCOLONKovy doesn't need protection, he's a retired player....same would apply to someone like Chris Pronger.

Guys like Pronger, Datsyuk and Savard would go on the list since they were under NHL contract last season. We also didn't use the injury designation...guys like Horton or Clarkson are eligible while in the NHL, they're leaving those players off. Also, we don't recognize NMC (no-movement clauses).

Hoping I don't have to protect kovy...

Kovy is officially a retired player, i'm99% sure he doesn't need protection

thom54 wroteCOLONKovy is officially a retired player, i'm99% sure he doesn't need protection

I'm positive he doesn't, the guys on That's Hockey said he doesn't need to be protected, and we are following the NHL rules.

Who's making the rules on this shit. This should have been sorted a while back no?

We aren't following NHL rules though since all NHL UFAs are exempt and here they are all available. We own all assets regardless of contract situation and Kovy isn't really retired if he is playing currently and assumed to be returning to the NHL.

Slipped through the cracks it seemed with focusing on other things. Will try and get a quick vote, but it seems like only Kovy and Dadonov are players worth protecting that are affected.

timwebb1212 wroteCOLONI'm honestly not sure what the exact rule is, but I do know that I own Dadonov in ADHL and have to protect him and I doubt it'd be different here.

It is different

we do everything half assed and just before deadline. you'll learn to accept it because no one seems willing to do anything about it.

I think Scott did a really good job organizing the sheets. It's not really viable to go over every player on a team to look for potential loop holes. At least this was brought up before rosters locked.

Kovy doesn't even have a NHL contract, and is only considering returning. I'm not sure why KapG needs to waste a P on him.

Dadonov is even less of a sure thing to return, does seem a waste to have to protect him

The BBKL Insider wroteCOLONKovy doesn't even have a NHL contract, and is only considering returning. I'm not sure why KapG needs to waste a P on him.

Should be resolved shortly if CC members come on.

For the argument for protection it's because no player is exempt because of contract status. This league has always completely ignored contract status and you own the asset forever and you can keep as many retired players on you docs as you want in hopes they return.

CAR

Protected FWDs:
Tomas Plekanec
Andreas Athanasiou
Carl Hagelin
Rickard Rakell
Jonathan Marchessault
Marcus Foligno
Melker Karlsson

Protected Dmen:
Danny DeKeyser
Marc-Edouard Vlasic
Justin Schultz

Protected G:
Kari Lehtonen

Exposed:
Matt Stajan
Michael Latta
Steven Hodges
Peter Holland
Ben Smith
Zac Dalpe
Brian Flynn
Kurtis Gabriel
Jayson Megna
Magnus Paajarvi
Cody Bass
Pierre-Cedric Labrie
Chris Terry
Petr Straka
Connor Crisp
Zac Rinaldo
Cole Schneider
Bryan Bickell
Jason Chimera
Simon Despres
Viktor Loov
Zbynek Michalek
Mark Streit
Ladislav Smid
Jamie McBain
Michael Kostka
Taylor Chorney
Alex Grant
David Warsofsky
Jarred Tinordi
Scott Harrington
Jyrki Jokipakka
Eric Gelinas
Antti Niemi
Henri Kiviaho
Max Lagace

Sorry tim for not giving u much to work with.....not lol
*this is as per my google...please someone check if it is correct*