Page 1 of 2

rangers block

PostedCOLON Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:21 pm
by KapG
Carcillo (picks)
McMillan (picks)
Franzen (for defense)
St. Louis (for defense)
Salvador (picks)
Malholtra (need a center coming back. Will trade fow + shtoi for hits and pims)

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 4:23 pm
by KapG
Bump

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 4:24 pm
by The BBKL Insider
pretty good block, contenders should be all over this

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 4:24 pm
by The BBKL Insider
i suspect shep with all his new cap space will be looking into MSL

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:12 pm
by KapG
The BBKL Insider wroteCOLONpretty good block, contenders should be all over this
Had an inquiry or two the past couple days. Not toooo much action yet.

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:16 pm
by kimmer
I need a dman

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:19 pm
by KapG
I'll trade you salvador

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:35 pm
by lightupdadarkness
Requirement for DMan?

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:45 pm
by Tony
kimmer wroteCOLONI need a dman
Grabner for Schultz or Jackman

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:50 pm
by kimmer
Why are you constantly trolling me bro

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:23 pm
by Tony
That's an overpayment.

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:32 pm
by kimmer
Grabner is a legit top 6 winger who pks + hits 4 times a game who unfortunately is seeing bottom 6 minutes due to younger kids getting some opportunities. Hes too valuable of a h2h contributor to forego for over 30 one dimensional bottom pairing minute dmen bro. Srys

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 7:06 pm
by Tony
Get back to me when you grasp the concept of supply and demand...

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 7:08 pm
by kimmer
No screw u

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 7:12 pm
by Matthew
is tony saying there is a huge supply of jackmans and that paul has no demand to overpay cuz he wont make the playoffs anyways, so he can wait for the right deal? I'm sure that is what he is saying.

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 7:23 pm
by KapG
Id rather run 5 defense than overpay for a fill in

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:00 pm
by Tony
My value is correct, but whatever. I'll keep my terrible players and continue to kick the shit out of most of your dream rosters.

(Sorry to hijack, Kyle)

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:02 pm
by Matthew
I actually didnt even check value. It probably is fair. I wasnt saying that it isnt - sorry. I Was just pointing out that Paul is currently not in a position where supply and demand matters.

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:06 pm
by KapG
You and I have always been close and iirc we had a close match week 1 Tony.

I'm not arguing against the value you have for your players. All I'm saying is that I personally would rather not trade for a player I would see as a fill in when its all said and done.

I don't mind the hijack fwiw, more views on my block the better as far as I'm concerned lol.

Re: rangers block

PostedCOLON Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:32 am
by Tony
Mainly just screwing with Kim.

[free bump]