Buds Board Keepers League

I wanted to play along too. Would need an NHL goaltender as part of the return. Starter or backup doesn't matter. Other than that open to different types of offers.

Tokarski +

I like this idea. Moving towards talbot, and cashing in on Lundy. Smart.

IT'S HAPPENING!!!

I suppose scrivens + would make sense cuz it gives u the edm duo.

Lee wroteCOLONTokarski +

So what's the offer?

Matthew wroteCOLONI suppose scrivens + would make sense cuz it gives u the edm duo.

Depends on the offer. Don't really care so much about who as much as I care about the rest of the return. Hank is still among a select few of elite goaltenders. I don't need to move him, but more than willing if the offer is right.

Not making an offer. I likely don't have enough assets. Just saying it would make sense.

Matthew wroteCOLONNot making an offer. I likely don't have enough assets. Just saying it would make sense.

*I'm* If you're not interested move along plz. Khudobin +

Ben Bishop + Justin Williams + Max Talbot
for
Henrik Lundqvist + Antoine Roussel + Erik Condra

Robin Hood wroteCOLONBen Bishop + Justin Williams + Max Talbot
for
Henrik Lundqvist + Antoine Roussel + Erik Condra

Where do you think you are getting the 3 best pieces in a 3-3? No thanks.

Dougie

lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONDougie

That would be a good offer, don't think there's a big market for Lundqvist.

CasperX22 wroteCOLON

Robin Hood wroteCOLONBen Bishop + Justin Williams + Max Talbot
for
Henrik Lundqvist + Antoine Roussel + Erik Condra

Where do you think you are getting the 3 best pieces in a 3-3? No thanks.

Don't see how this is a bad offer. Bishop is much cheaper and much younger than Lundqvist. Oh welL

Robin Hood wroteCOLON

CasperX22 wroteCOLON

Robin Hood wroteCOLONBen Bishop + Justin Williams + Max Talbot
for
Henrik Lundqvist + Antoine Roussel + Erik Condra

Where do you think you are getting the 3 best pieces in a 3-3? No thanks.

Don't see how this is a bad offer. Bishop is much cheaper and much younger than Lundqvist. Oh welL

And not in Lundqvist's class. Not too worried about the cap. And I bet you wouldn't think getting the 3 best pieces in the deal would be a bad offer

Bruyns wroteCOLON

lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONDougie

That would be a good offer, don't think there's a big market for Lundqvist.

Considering Lundqvist could win 25% of the categories by himself a lot of weeks that makes sense

If backup goalies have been getting 2 1sts + prospect or even 1 1st + prospect, one would assume star starters would demand more than Doug hamilton, when there isnt another goalie coming back.

CasperX22 wroteCOLON

Bruyns wroteCOLON

lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONDougie

That would be a good offer, don't think there's a big market for Lundqvist.

Considering Lundqvist could win 25% of the categories by himself a lot of weeks that makes sense

He could also lose 25% by himself. This isn't the NHL it's fantasy and 8.5 is a lot to pay someone. He wasn't top 10 in wins or SV % and was 8th in GAA. This means he is far from a sure thing to win goalie stats every week and GMs have to weigh if all that extra cap space is worth what amounts to a small edge in goaltending on a weekly basis.

I didn't mean the market is small because he isn't good though. The comment was because there are only a limited number of GMs looking for a goalie.

Matthew wroteCOLONIf backup goalies have been getting 2 1sts + prospect or even 1 1st + prospect, one would assume star starters would demand more than Doug hamilton, when there isnt another goalie coming back.

What backup went for prices like that? Only ones that go for that have starter potential. Steve Mason for example had superior numbers across the board at a far lower cost but I don't think people would call him a star.

There's a reason why Casper is shopping Lundqvist rather than Talbot since I think he is smart enough to know he is paid too much in this league.

Bruyns wroteCOLON

CasperX22 wroteCOLON

Bruyns wroteCOLON

lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONDougie

That would be a good offer, don't think there's a big market for Lundqvist.

Considering Lundqvist could win 25% of the categories by himself a lot of weeks that makes sense

He could also lose 25% by himself. This isn't the NHL it's fantasy and 8.5 is a lot to pay someone. He wasn't top 10 in wins or SV % and was 8th in GAA. This means he is far from a sure thing to win goalie stats every week and GMs have to weigh if all that extra cap space is worth what amounts to a small edge in goaltending on a weekly basis.

I didn't mean the market is small because he isn't good though. The comment was because there are only a limited number of GMs looking for a goalie.

Of course he wasn't top 10 in wins he was hurt and Talbot carried them lol! Lundy is not losing 25% categories by himself...just...just...stop lol! If you are trying to contend you aren't winning without solid goaltending and this is an elite goaltender being offered up.