Page 1 of 2

VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Thu Jun 16, 2016 8:30 pm
by Fraser
To Los Angeles:

Chris Tanev
Ryan Pulock
2018 1st Rounder (VAN)
2017 3rd Rounder (LAK)

To Vancouver:

Victor Hedman

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Thu Jun 16, 2016 8:32 pm
by The BBKL Insider
Wasn't going to protect hedman. I suspect you'll start seeing value deals like this.

Confirm.

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Thu Jun 16, 2016 8:36 pm
by Tony
1st overall pickn in 2018 right there.

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Thu Jun 16, 2016 8:38 pm
by Matthew
Really nice for Fraser.

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Thu Jun 16, 2016 8:49 pm
by Arian The Insider
Fair value considering Steve wasn't going to protect Hedman. Interested to see how many deals like this happen due to expansion

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Thu Jun 16, 2016 8:53 pm
by Matthew
Question: does playing 2 years in a non - north American pro league (KHL, SHL, Liiga) mean a player needs to be protected? So for example buchnevich.

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Thu Jun 16, 2016 8:55 pm
by The BBKL Insider
Matthew wroteCOLONQuestion: does playing 2 years in a non - north American pro league (KHL, SHL, Liiga) mean a player needs to be protected? So for example buchnevich.
My understanding is he is exempt.

AHL/NHL only.

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Thu Jun 16, 2016 8:59 pm
by Fraser
Have we set our rules on this for sure yet? Personally I think 2 AHL 1 NHL season players being available doesn't seem right to me.

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Thu Jun 16, 2016 9:00 pm
by Matthew
We can only lose 1 player each. It's not the end of the world.

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Fri Jun 17, 2016 7:17 am
by kyuss
looks good for fraser ! #notafarmteam

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Fri Jun 17, 2016 7:30 am
by Handsome&FairMike
Totally missed tanev in this deal the first time I looked at it. really prefer Steve's side.

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:03 am
by Sensfanjosh
I think Steve does well, gets a young cost-controlled D who might not be as good as Hedman but is solid, and he adds a great prospect and two good picks as well. Hedman is UFA after this season as well which makes his cap hit unpredictable going forward.

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:13 am
by Bruyns
I'd take Steve's side too but pretty fair.

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:55 am
by kyuss
Sensfanjosh wroteCOLONI think Steve does well, gets a young cost-controlled D who might not be as good as Hedman but is solid, and he adds a great prospect and two good picks as well. Hedman is UFA after this season as well which makes his cap hit unpredictable going forward.
he still has 1 yr at 4M though, if it was a UFA today would be very different

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:00 am
by Matthew
There are a couple teams who will definitely need to move dmen for expansion. Either trading for futures or upgrading their 2 dmen for 1 better dman.

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:02 am
by lightupdadarkness
Like for Steve Victor getting at least 9m a year IMO

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:15 am
by CasperX22
Easy deal for Steve to make given the circumstances. Hedman could touch 10 m aav after this year.

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:10 am
by Bruyns
Matthew wroteCOLONThere are a couple teams who will definitely need to move dmen for expansion. Either trading for futures or upgrading their 2 dmen for 1 better dman.
Depends on the situation too, for me if I expect to lose Andersen I can leave really valuable players unprotected. I can only lose one player so if I lose Andersen then who cares how amazing my other unprotected guys are since they won't be taken or one does and I keep my goalies. Some teams might not have a lot of motivation to worry about trading good players for futures knowing they can only lose one guy.

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:12 am
by thom54
Yea, i think if you have a clear top8 forwards for example, well it makes sense to consolidate that. But if you have a deeper team and the unprotected guys are all roughly similar value ... you either completely overhaul, or just continue on with business as usual and know you'll lose on of your multiple assets.

Re: VAN/LAK Casual Blockbuster

PostedCOLON Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:18 am
by Fraser
Bruyns wroteCOLON
Matthew wroteCOLONThere are a couple teams who will definitely need to move dmen for expansion. Either trading for futures or upgrading their 2 dmen for 1 better dman.
Depends on the situation too, for me if I expect to lose Andersen I can leave really valuable players unprotected. I can only lose one player so if I lose Andersen then who cares how amazing my other unprotected guys are since they won't be taken or one does and I keep my goalies. Some teams might not have a lot of motivation to worry about trading good players for futures knowing they can only lose one guy.
Interesting perspective.