CHI/STL
Re: CHI/STL
Done deal.
-
- PostsCOLON 4810
- JoinedCOLON Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:41 am
- LocationCOLON Wolfville, NS
Re: CHI/STL
Nice cheap goalie GP
Re: CHI/STL
Got something for Anderson. Now I can just call up Georgiev and let the goalies do their thing for the year. I'm happy.
Re: CHI/STL
That was mighty nice of Chicago with St. Louis on pace to miss goalie gp and currently on pace for a top 5 pick.
Re: CHI/STL
Us bottom 5 teams need to stick together. Together we will take over the world.CasperX22 wroteCOLONThat was mighty nice of Chicago with St. Louis on pace to miss goalie gp and currently on pace for a top 5 pick.
Re: CHI/STL
I’d love to see that !Da_Hawks wroteCOLONUs bottom 5 teams need to stick together. Together we will take over the world.CasperX22 wroteCOLONThat was mighty nice of Chicago with St. Louis on pace to miss goalie gp and currently on pace for a top 5 pick.
I think overall ... it’s a titch cheap in a vacuum BUT with the Bbkl market is what it is ... it’s fair- who else would pay for Anderson?
He’s pricy, old as Dave’s balls and on a baaaad team. Very little utility realistically outside of GP.
Good deal
Re: CHI/STL
First concrete offer I've received on Anderson over the past few years. He was a great tool to tank with, but he's in his final year so I`m good to extract some value - maybe even be able to flip that for a gp piece for another position.
Anyone want to share their wealth at C with me???
Anyone want to share their wealth at C with me???
Re: CHI/STL
Oh it's definitely cheap. I would have easily paid more than this in the off-season.thom54 wroteCOLONI’d love to see that !Da_Hawks wroteCOLONUs bottom 5 teams need to stick together. Together we will take over the world.CasperX22 wroteCOLONThat was mighty nice of Chicago with St. Louis on pace to miss goalie gp and currently on pace for a top 5 pick.
I think overall ... it’s a titch cheap in a vacuum BUT with the Bbkl market is what it is ... it’s fair- who else would pay for Anderson?
He’s pricy, old as Dave’s balls and on a baaaad team. Very little utility realistically outside of GP.
Good deal
Re: CHI/STL
No you would not have, don't lie Casper.CasperX22 wroteCOLONOh it's definitely cheap. I would have easily paid more than this in the off-season.thom54 wroteCOLONI’d love to see that !Da_Hawks wroteCOLONUs bottom 5 teams need to stick together. Together we will take over the world.CasperX22 wroteCOLONThat was mighty nice of Chicago with St. Louis on pace to miss goalie gp and currently on pace for a top 5 pick.
I think overall ... it’s a titch cheap in a vacuum BUT with the Bbkl market is what it is ... it’s fair- who else would pay for Anderson?
He’s pricy, old as Dave’s balls and on a baaaad team. Very little utility realistically outside of GP.
Good deal
Re: CHI/STL
I nearly traded Zach Jones for Kinkaid before buying Rinne. Snooze ya lose bud.
Re: CHI/STL
So to you ''way more'' means a recent 3rd round pick instead of a 4th? Yeah, I gone and fucked up real bad there.CasperX22 wroteCOLONI nearly traded Zach Jones for Kinkaid before buying Rinne. Snooze ya lose bud.
Re: CHI/STL
For one, I didn't say "wayyyyyyy more." I said I would have easily paid more. And for the record 11 pts in 13 gp in his freshman season in the NCAA is nothing to sneeze at. I considered taking him with my own 2nd before trading down to the top of the 3rd rd. And I definitely value Anderson higher than Kinkaid, so yeah I think it's safe to say taking a 4th is a loss on value considering the drop off in value into the 4th round.
Re: CHI/STL
Yes but those stats are for this season - you were looking to trade him in the off-season. Not the same value. Nice try though!CasperX22 wroteCOLONFor one, I didn't say "wayyyyyyy more." I said I would have easily paid more. And for the record 11 pts in 13 gp in his freshman season in the NCAA is nothing to sneeze at. I considered taking him with my own 2nd before trading down to the top of the 3rd rd. And I definitely value Anderson higher than Kinkaid, so yeah I think it's safe to say taking a 4th is a loss on value considering the drop off in value into the 4th round.
Re: CHI/STL
And he was still worth a 2nd in the off-season. If you're happy with your trade that's fine. I'm just echoing others sentiment that you could've done better.
Re: CHI/STL
And i'm still calling shenanigans on yours and others comment. He's been on my trade block since the draft and Koomz was the first legit offer. Value only goes as far as the offers made, and his was the only offer so I took it.CasperX22 wroteCOLONAnd he was still worth a 2nd in the off-season. If you're happy with your trade that's fine. I'm just echoing others sentiment that you could've done better.
Re: CHI/STL
Well I can only speak for myself, but I'm sure others figured the price would be much higher and didn't bother asking.
Re: CHI/STL
You figured that a 4.75 M really bad back-up goalie with 1-year left before retirement would cost a lot? Mmmmkay.CasperX22 wroteCOLONWell I can only speak for myself, but I'm sure others figured the price would be much higher and didn't bother asking.
Re: CHI/STL
Not sure I would consider a goalie that has averaged 52 starts the past few seasons a backup, but sure.