The Ultimate Fantasy Hockey Experience
http://nhlnotes.com/bbkl/
There is no official rule posted in the RULES Thread, therfore it's legit.. i find this rule interesting though:Kezia wroteCOLONI thought conditional picks weren't allowed?
i kid i kid!1) Each team is required to have 41 goalie games played.
Fine: 1st round draft pick 1.1) If your 'starter' is placed on the long term disability and you are unable to find a replacement special considerations can be made.
Rule 1.1) Global Admins will use judgement
the only things i remember are Mike making a post against conditions over the # of games played and others asking for "future considerations" to be specified. That's it, and in the rules i could not even find evidences about those 2 specific things.Kezia wroteCOLONI thought conditional picks weren't allowed?
Agreed, those are two rulings I remember however until they are posted in the OFFICAL RULES thread we can not police it because frankly that wouldn't be fair to GM's.kyuss wroteCOLONthe only things i remember are Mike making a post against conditions over the # of games played and others asking for "future considerations" to be specified. That's it, and in the rules i could not even find evidences about those 2 specific things.Kezia wroteCOLONI thought conditional picks weren't allowed?
shouldn't those be discussed within the CC though? i don't think they were back then, and personally i don't feel like GP need to be banned as potential conditions: they are precise and verifiable.Mashley93 wroteCOLONAgreed, those are two rulings I remember however until they are posted in the OFFICAL RULES thread we can not police it because frankly that wouldn't be fair to GM's.kyuss wroteCOLONthe only things i remember are Mike making a post against conditions over the # of games played and others asking for "future considerations" to be specified. That's it, and in the rules i could not even find evidences about those 2 specific things.Kezia wroteCOLONI thought conditional picks weren't allowed?
PS - I will get on adding those two conditions to the rulebook right now.
It was discussed in the CC back when the issue was fresh. The choice was made but the rulebook wasn't updated that is all.kyuss wroteCOLONshouldn't those be discussed within the CC though? i don't think they were back then, and personally i don't feel like GP need to be banned as potential conditions: they are precise and verifiable.Mashley93 wroteCOLONAgreed, those are two rulings I remember however until they are posted in the OFFICAL RULES thread we can not police it because frankly that wouldn't be fair to GM's.kyuss wroteCOLONthe only things i remember are Mike making a post against conditions over the # of games played and others asking for "future considerations" to be specified. That's it, and in the rules i could not even find evidences about those 2 specific things.Kezia wroteCOLONI thought conditional picks weren't allowed?
PS - I will get on adding those two conditions to the rulebook right now.
still destroyed by the news..MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON2nd rounder for free, nice deal Mik.
