Buds Board Keepers League

I've had a lot of GMs ask about him in the last few weeks and I've immediately replied that I'm not interested in trading him. On the block. Make an offer if interested. PM/MSN

burrows + setoguchi for marleau

Downie & Rattie

The Devil wroteCOLONDownie & Rattie

dude, keep your joke offers to yourself please. this is a serious thread.

anton wroteCOLONburrows + setoguchi for marleau

lol.

SuperMario wroteCOLON

anton wroteCOLONburrows + setoguchi for marleau

lol.

For the hell of it, using my flawed power rankings:

78 (Burrows) + 155 (Setoguchi) for 27 (Marleau)

System is tipped towards centers in this iteration, haven't quite worked out the kinks.

looks about right

so, Marleau's the 27th best player? Or?

ye, have you check his stats, dude is money h2h.

The Devil wroteCOLONso, Marleau's the 27th best player? Or?

I should have specified, all three of these rankings are for FORWARDS only.

Mike wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLON

anton wroteCOLONburrows + setoguchi for marleau

lol.

For the hell of it, using my flawed power rankings:

78 (Burrows) + 155 (Setoguchi) for 27 (Marleau)

System is tipped towards centers in this iteration, haven't quite worked out the kinks.

It is flawed. Burrows alone is worth more than Marleau. Marleau is actually a negative asset as a Center. He ensures you LOSE FOW every single week. Not to mention the 4.9M in cap difference for a very similar stat line.

The Devil wroteCOLONso, Marleau's the 27th best player? Or?

No he is not. lol.

SuperMario wroteCOLON

Mike wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLON

anton wroteCOLONburrows + setoguchi for marleau

lol.

For the hell of it, using my flawed power rankings:

78 (Burrows) + 155 (Setoguchi) for 27 (Marleau)

System is tipped towards centers in this iteration, haven't quite worked out the kinks.

It is flawed. Burrows alone is worth more than Marleau. Marleau is actually a negative asset as a Center. He ensures you LOSE FOW every single week. Not to mention the 4.9M in cap difference for a very similar stat line.

Marleau: 707
Burrows: 573

Faceoffs could only account for ~30 points difference.

SuperMario wroteCOLON

The Devil wroteCOLONso, Marleau's the 27th best player? Or?

No he is not. lol.

I was referring to Mikes ranking.. I didn't believe it to be true.

Patties # are really nice.

Shiv do you have 3 centres right now, but are claiming adding him would ensure you lose FOW every week?

Mike wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLON

Mike wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLON

anton wroteCOLONburrows + setoguchi for marleau

lol.

For the hell of it, using my flawed power rankings:

78 (Burrows) + 155 (Setoguchi) for 27 (Marleau)

System is tipped towards centers in this iteration, haven't quite worked out the kinks.

It is flawed. Burrows alone is worth more than Marleau. Marleau is actually a negative asset as a Center. He ensures you LOSE FOW every single week. Not to mention the 4.9M in cap difference for a very similar stat line.

Marleau: 707
Burrows: 573

Faceoffs could only account for ~30 points difference.

That's not what I'm saying though. A team with Marleau as one of its 5 Cs is at a major disadvantage compared to a team with 5 Legit Cs. You immediately start the week down 0-1-0.

Secondly, the difference between Marleau and Burrows is 4.9 M in cap. Projecting their stat lines:

Marleau: 35 G, 35 A, 20 PIMS, 80 Hits, 160 SHTOI, 275 SOG
Burrows: 25 G, 30 A, 100 PIMS, 80 Hits, 200 SHTOI, 200 SOG

Why am I expending $5M more in cap for 10 Goals and 75 Shots?

Nick wroteCOLONPatties # are really nice.

Shiv do you have 3 centres right now, but are claiming adding him would ensure you lose FOW every week?

Read my post regarding Marleau's numbers vs Burrows'.

As far as FOW is concerned, you're assuming I have no options. if I traded for Marleau, I'd have to retrade him for a Center or a Winger. I'd rather keep Burrows and find a Center that actually gets FOW.

Oh and btw, this is not to mention that more teams want Burrows on their team than Marleau.

SuperMario wroteCOLONThat's not what I'm saying though. A team with Marleau as one of its 5 Cs is at a major disadvantage compared to a team with 5 Legit Cs. You immediately start the week down 0-1-0.

Secondly, the difference between Marleau and Burrows is 4.9 M in cap. Projecting their stat lines:

Marleau: 35 G, 35 A, 20 PIMS, 80 Hits, 160 SHTOI, 275 SOG
Burrows: 25 G, 30 A, 100 PIMS, 80 Hits, 200 SHTOI, 200 SOG

Why am I expending $5M more in cap for 10 Goals and 75 Shots?

I am not accounting for salary. The values I put forth are based solely on production, not intrinsic value.

The penalty for Marleau being a center is more than accounted for in their production gulf.

where did u get those # from shiv?

http://bbkl.hockey.cbssports.com/player ... :p/scoring?

+14a
+280fow
+9g
+5gwg
-50pims
+25pts
+120sog
+26 stpts
----------
+4.9M

and a player who produces on own merit not that of his teammates.

Mike wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLONThat's not what I'm saying though. A team with Marleau as one of its 5 Cs is at a major disadvantage compared to a team with 5 Legit Cs. You immediately start the week down 0-1-0.

Secondly, the difference between Marleau and Burrows is 4.9 M in cap. Projecting their stat lines:

Marleau: 35 G, 35 A, 20 PIMS, 80 Hits, 160 SHTOI, 275 SOG
Burrows: 25 G, 30 A, 100 PIMS, 80 Hits, 200 SHTOI, 200 SOG

Why am I expending $5M more in cap for 10 Goals and 75 Shots?

I am not accounting for salary. The values I put forth are based solely on production, not intrinsic value.

The penalty for Marleau being a center is more than accounted for in their production gulf.

Absolutely. But to talk about rankings without salary is silly. And IMO the the difference in production does not merit spending 5M more on cap. It's borderline insanity.